Biological imprint of education and rights-based brain capital.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The exposome of brain aging across 34 countries.Nature medicine · 2026
   Article
2. Childhood adversities and the exposome in dementia risk and brain health.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2026
   Review
3. Computational whole-body-exposome models for global precision brain health.Nature communications · 2025
   Article
4. Biological imprint of education and rights-based brain capital.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
   Article
5. Guaranteeing girls' right to education: an imperative for global brain health.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as