ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025
Evaluation of a virtual emergency care service to avoid unnecessary emergency department presentations and provide specialist-led definitive care.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the impact of a peer-to-peer telehealth service called Specialist Telehealth Aotearoa (STAR) on transfers to the ED.
methodsThis mixed-methods study reviewed STAR between 31 July 2023 and 31 October 2023. Reasons for presentation and outcomes were analysed. Thematic analysis was used to examine responses to an electronic survey from referrers to the STAR service, exploring the benefits and barriers to engagement with the service.
resultsEight hundred and sixty-seven consultations occurred, with hospital transfer avoided for 500 (58%) patients. Fifty-one patients (10.2%) re-presented to Christchurch Hospital within 7 days with the same/related issue, similar to the overall hospital 7-day re-presentation rate of 9.5%. Survey responses were received from 130 ambulance staff and rural practitioners, with 97% reporting a 'very good' or 'excellent' experience with STAR. Thematic analysis of responses from referrers identified four main benefits: local FACEMs who understand the local context, mutual trust built on pre-existing relationships, empowering pre-hospital and rural clinicians and putting the patient first: providing right care-right place-right time.
conclusionsSTAR prevented unnecessary transfers to ED with a 7-day representation rate comparable to the wider hospital. Referrers reported a number of benefits to the service, as well as identifying potential barriers to engagement. The integration of a specialist emergency care telehealth service into the health system could alleviate pressure on EDs in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.