Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312932›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2026

The Omission of Nursing Care in Emergency Departments: A Conceptual Analysis Using Walker & Avant's Methodology.

Josiane Provost, Émilie Gosselin, Christian M Rochefort

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josiane ProvostHealth Sciences Research Program, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9698-2990
Émilie GosselinNursing, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Christian M RochefortFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-8382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIM(S): To analyse the dimensions of the omission of nursing care in emergency departments, including its attributes, antecedents, and consequences, using Walker & Avant's concept analysis method. DESIGN CONCEPT ANALYSIS: Methods: Walker and Avant's eight-step method defined attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the omission of nursing care in emergency departments. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Health Management Database, and Cochrane Library, covering publications from 2001 to 2024. The search was conducted in August 2024.

resultsKey attributes were delayed, incomplete, or interrupted care, mostly due to insufficient staffing or unpredictable patient volumes. Antecedents included high workloads, inadequate skill mixes, and understaffing. Consequences were increased patient morbidity and mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. A research gap exists in paediatric-specific measurement tools.

conclusionIdentifying dimensions of omitted nursing care in emergency departments informs interventions to improve patient safety and care quality. Developing paediatric-specific measurement tools is essential. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The findings emphasise the need for improved staffing and resource allocation policies, reducing risks to patients and enhancing nurse satisfaction. IMPACT: This study addressed the gap in understanding omitted nursing care specifically in emergency departments. Findings highlight systemic issues impacting patient outcomes and nurse well-being. The results will guide organisational improvements and future research globally. REPORTING

methodThis study adhered to EQUATOR guidelines, following Walker and Avant's method for concept analysis. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement. IMPACT STATEMENT: This study underscores the critical impact of the omission of nursing care (ONC) in emergency departments (EDs) on patient safety, nurse well-being, and healthcare efficiency. ONC contributes to increased morbidity, mortality, and adverse events, highlighting the urgent need for improved staffing models and resource allocation. Training programmes should equip emergency nurses with prioritisation strategies to mitigate care omissions. Policymakers must recognise ONC as a key quality indicator, ensuring adequate workforce support. Additionally, this study identifies a gap in measuring ONC in paediatric EDs, calling for the development of tailored assessment tools and further research on intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Emergency NursingEmergency Service, HospitalNursing CareNursing Staff, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansMaleQuality of Health CareWorkloadcare rationingconcept analysisemergency nursinghealth policymissed nursing carenursing managementnursing shortagespatient safetyquality of careworkload

Identifiers

PMID40312932
PMCPMC12810661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.