Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312782›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2025

Detectable land use impact on methanotrophs and methanogens in kettle hole sediments but not on net methane production potentials.

Danica Kynast, Florian Reverey, Lars Ganzert, Hans-Peter Grossart, Gunnar Lischeid, Steffen Kolb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Danica KynastLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Working Group: Microbial Biogeochemistry, Eberswalder Str. 84, D-15374 Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-3140-2124
Florian RevereyLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Working Group: Dimensionality Assessment and Reduction, Eberswalder Str. 84, D-15374 Müncheberg, Germany.
Lars GanzertLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of Plankton and Microbial Ecology, Alte Fischerhütte 2, OT Neuglobsow, D-16775 Stechlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9595-1041
Hans-Peter GrossartLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of Plankton and Microbial Ecology, Alte Fischerhütte 2, OT Neuglobsow, D-16775 Stechlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9141-0325
Gunnar LischeidLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Working Group: Dimensionality Assessment and Reduction, Eberswalder Str. 84, D-15374 Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3700-6062
Steffen KolbLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Working Group: Microbial Biogeochemistry, Eberswalder Str. 84, D-15374 Müncheberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5455-8662

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 465808595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kettle holes (KHs) are dynamic freshwater systems and potential sources of the greenhouse gas methane. Due to their small size (<1 hectare), KHs are subject to inorganic and organic matter input from their terrestrial surroundings, governed by land use. Matter inputs include inorganic solutes that are alternative electron acceptors and impact on methanotrophs and methanogens. Thus, they might affect methane net production. We sampled 10 kettle hole sediments embedded in landscapes with either agricultural or forest land use and determined their (i) potential net methane production rates, (ii) the composition of their microbial communities, and (iii) physicochemical soil parameters. Potential net methane production did not significantly differ by land use type but between single KHs. However, land use type had a strong impact on methanotroph and methanogen and on total bacterial and archaeal microbiota structure. Relative abundances of methanotrophs and methanogens were significantly higher in agricultural KHs, and their relative abundances were among the most influential variables projecting net methane production potentials along with nutrient status and water content. Land use type was thus identified as a major factor that impacts the structure and biodiversity of general and methane-cycling microbiota, but it did not affect net methane production potentials.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaGeologic SedimentsMethaneAgricultureBiodiversityForestsMicrobiotaSoilSoil MicrobiologyMethaneSoilkettle holeland usemethanemethanogensmethanotrophssediments

Identifiers

PMID40312782
PMCPMC12089754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.