Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312758›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025

A pilot study of intraoperative melphalan to prevent recurrent PVR: the IOMPVR study.

Carlos A Moreira-Neto, Jose S Pulido, Luca Bongiovanni de Miranda Gonçalves, Gabriel Nunes Cavalcanti, Acacio Souza Lima, José de Paula Barbosa Neto, Daniel Lavinsky, Talita Virginia Fernandes de Oliveira, Fernando Ejii Ogata, Lucas Zago Ribeiro and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Carlos A Moreira-NetoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil. camoreiraneto@gmail.com.
Jose S PulidoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Luca Bongiovanni de Miranda GonçalvesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
Gabriel Nunes CavalcantiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
Acacio Souza LimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
José de Paula Barbosa NetoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
Daniel LavinskyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
Talita Virginia Fernandes de OliveiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
Fernando Ejii OgataVitreoretinal Unit, Hospital de Olhos do Parana, Parana, Brazil.
Lucas Zago RibeiroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
Luiz Fernando TeixeiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ocular Oncology Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Flavia Borelli Gomes do NascimentoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ocular Oncology Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz H LimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
Octaviano Jr MagalhãesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
Michel Eid FarahDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.
Maurício MaiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP/EPM), 821, Botucatu Sreet, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil04023-062, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil 2022/16653-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is a major cause of failure in cases of retinal detachment (RD) repair. Intravitreal melphalan, a known inhibitor of cellular proliferation, offers a novel therapeutic approach to reduce PVR recurrence and improve outcomes. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of 5 µg/0.1 ml intravitreal melphalan at the end of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) before silicone oil (SO) injection in eyes with primary PVR related to rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) with a minimal 90-day follow-up period.

methodsThis prospective, cross-sectional, interventional pilot study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology of the Federal University of São Paulo in patients with primary RRD and PVR. Patients were included who were aged 18 to 85 years with PVR grade CP2 or worse secondary to RRDs in eyes without having undergone a previous RRD surgery. They underwent PPV + scleral buckle + fluid air exchange followed by intravitreal injection of 5 µg/0.1 ml melphalan (270 mOsm) and SO injection.

resultsSix eyes of six patients were enrolled. Ocular examination and imaging showed no retinal toxicity. The logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity improved from the mean ± standard deviation preoperatively of 2.11 ± 0.22 to 0.89 ± 0.37 at 30 and to 0.84 ± 0.42 at 90 days postoperative (P < 0.001). Optical coherence tomography identified intraretinal cysts in five of six eyes and outer retinal layer loss in all study eyes. Only one of six eyes developed a recurrent localized RD on day 90 unrelated to recurrent PVR. PVR recurrence was not observed during the study follow-up.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, the preliminary data showed that PPV followed by intravitreal injection of 5 µg/0.1 ml melphalan was not related to ocular toxicity. The absence of PVR recurrence at 3 months follow-up in these complex PVR eyes is an interesting finding that justifies further investigation.

Indexed as

MelphalanPars plana vitrectomyProliferative vitreoretinopathyR hegmatogenous retinal detachment

Identifiers

PMID40312758
PMCPMC12044764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.