ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for premenopausal breast cancer in 19 cohorts.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncidence of premenopausal breast cancer (BC) has risen in recent years, though most existing BC prediction models are not generalizable to young women due to underrepresentation of this age group in model development.
methodsUsing questionnaire-based data from 19 prospective studies harmonized within the Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group (PBCCG), representing 783,830 women, we developed a premenopausal BC risk prediction model. The data were split into training (2/3) and validation (1/3) datasets with equal distribution of cohorts in each. In the training dataset variables were chosen from known and hypothesized risk factors: age, age at menarche, age at first birth, parity, breastfeeding, height, BMI, young adulthood BMI, recent weight change, alcohol consumption, first-degree family history of BC, and personal history of benign breast disease (BBD). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression using age as time scale, stratified by cohort. Given that complete information on all risk factors was not available in all cohorts, coefficients were estimated separately in groups of cohorts with the same available covariate information, adjusted to account for the correlation between missing and non-missing variables and meta-analyzed. Absolute risk of BC (in situ or invasive) within 5 years, was determined using country-, age-, and birth cohort-specific incidence rates. Discrimination (area under the curve, AUC) and calibration (Expected/Observed, E/O) were evaluated in the validation dataset. We compared our model with a literature-based model for women < 50 years (iCARE-Lit).
resultsSelected model risk factors were age at menarche, parity, height, current and young adulthood BMI, family history of BC, and personal BBD history. Predicted absolute 5-year risk ranged from 0% to 5.7%. The model overestimated risk on average [E/O risk = 1.18 (1.14-1.23)], with underestimation of risk in lower absolute risk deciles and overestimation in upper absolute risk deciles [E/O 1st decile = 0.59 (0.58-0.60); E/O 10th decile = 1.48 (1.48-1.49)]. The AUC was 59.1% (58.1-60.1%). Performance was similar to the iCARE-Lit model.
conclusionIn this prediction model for premenopausal BC, the relative contribution of risk factors to absolute risk was similar to existing models for overall BC. The discriminatory ability was nearly identical (< 1% difference in AUC) to the existing iCARE-Lit model developed in women under 50 years. The inability to improve discrimination highlights the need to investigate additional predictors to better understand premenopausal BC risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.