Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312750›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2025

Therapy-induced senescence is a transient drug resistance mechanism in breast cancer.

Eszter Bajtai, Csaba Kiss, Éva Bakos, Tamás Langó, Anna Lovrics, Éva Schád, Viktória Tisza, Károly Hegedűs, Péter Fürjes, Zoltán Szabó and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ALYREF-mediated mInternational journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Unleashing endogenous regeneration by senolytics.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Eszter BajtaiInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Csaba KissInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Éva BakosInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Tamás LangóInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Anna LovricsInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Éva SchádInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Viktória TiszaInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Károly HegedűsInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Péter FürjesInstitute of Technical Physics and Materials Science, HUN-REN Centre of Energy Research, Budapest, 1121, Hungary.
Zoltán SzabóDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Gábor E TusnádyInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Gergely SzakácsInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Ágnes TantosInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Sándor SpisákInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary. spisak.sandor@ttk.hu.
József TóváriSemmelweis University Doctoral School, Budapest, 1085, Hungary. tovari.jozsef@oncol.hu.
András FürediInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, Center of Excellence of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary. furedi.andras@ttk.hu.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101065044Hungarian Research Network KSZF-160/2024Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Bolyai János Research FellowshipNational Research, Development and Innovation Office 2019-1.3.1-KK-2019-00007National Research, Development and Innovation Office FK142835National Research, Development and Innovation Office K142851National Research, Development and Innovation Office K146314National Research, Development and Innovation Office K147410National Research, Development and Innovation Office TKP2021-EGA-04National Research, Development and Innovation Office TKP2021-EGA-32
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapy-induced senescence (TIS) is considered a permanent cell cycle arrest following DNA-damaging treatments; however, its irreversibility has recently been challenged. Here, we demonstrate that escape from TIS is universal across breast cancer cells. Moreover, TIS provides a reversible drug resistance mechanism that ensures the survival of the population, and could contribute to relapse.

methodsTIS was induced in four different breast cancer cell line with high-dose chemotherapy and cultured until cells escaped TIS. Parental, TIS and repopulating cells were analyzed by bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing and surface proteomics. A genetically engineered mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer was used to prove why current senolytics cannot overcome TIS in tumors.

resultsScreening the toxicity of a diverse panel of FDA-approved anticancer drugs revealed that TIS meditates resistance to half of these compounds, despite their distinct mechanism of action. Bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing, along with surface proteome analysis, showed that while parental and repopulating cells are almost identical, TIS cells are significantly different from both, highlighting their transient nature. Furthermore, investigating dozens of known drug resistance mechanisms offered no explanation for this unique drug resistance pattern. Additionally, TIS cells expressed a gene set associated with immune evasion and a potential KRAS-driven escape mechanism from TIS.

conclusionOur results reveal that TIS, as a transient drug resistance mechanism, could contribute to overcome the immune response and to relapse by reverting to a proliferative stage.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCellular SenescenceDrug Resistance, NeoplasmAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansMiceXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsBreast cancerDrug resistanceSenescence escapeTherapy-induced senescenceTumor relapse

Identifiers

PMID40312750
PMCPMC12044945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.