Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312743›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Evaluating spoke facilitation costs of implementing TelePain in the Veterans Health Administration.

Alexandra L Rose, Shaina Coogan, Jess Indresano, Steven B Zeliadt, Jessica A Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra L RoseDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, 4094 Campus Drive, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. alrose@umd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9689-0834
Shaina CooganSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Systems Research (HSR), 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Jess IndresanoSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Systems Research (HSR), 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Steven B ZeliadtSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Systems Research (HSR), 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Jessica A ChenSeattle-Denver Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Systems Research (HSR), 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA I50 HX002902HSRD VA I50 HX003430Quality Enhancement Research Initiative I50 HX002902, PII-19-320Quality Enhancement Research Initiative I50HX003430, PEC 21-128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high prevalence and significant morbidity and mortality associated with chronic pain among veterans has made expansion of pain services within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) a key priority. TelePain, in which services are provided via telehealth from central "hub" sites to patients at decentralized "spoke" sites, is one such model with positive implementation findings to date. However, the staff effort and cost of implementation have yet to be examined when considering TelePain or similar virtual hub-and spoke models of specialty pain care, information that is critical for expansion of services.

methodsUsing an established time-based activity tracker designed for implementation facilitation, study staff tracked minutes spent on implementation activities at 11 spoke sites. Annual salaries were extracted to calculate an average cost per minute for each personnel type. Costs per personnel minute were combined with activity data to calculate costs of implementation activities at spoke sites. Implementation reach outcomes for the first 36 months of implementation were extracted from the electronic health record. Service utilization data was combined with cost data to calculate cost per patient reached and per clinical encounter achieved at each site.

resultsTotal facilitation costs (range: $1,746-$7,978) and unique patients reached (range: 2-46) varied considerably across spoke sites and greater staff implementation efforts (measured in time or cost) were not associated with greater numbers of patients reached. Therefore, costs per patient reached also varied widely (range: $120-2,569) across spoke sites. Key challenges included high rurality and small clinic size; insufficient engagement of frontline providers; lack of referral options for high acuity patients; and lack of existing programming within which to situate pain services.

conclusionsAt spoke sites where patients were consistently referred and reached, costs were relatively modest, particularly compared to the high cost of untreated chronic pain, suggesting the potential impact of this model at scale. However, in spoke sites where referrals and encounters were low during initial implementation, cost per patient was high. Findings highlight the need for better methods for tailoring of facilitation interventions to spoke site's individual needs to maximize impact.

Indexed as

Chronic painCosts and cost analysisHealth services accessibilityVeterans

Identifiers

PMID40312743
PMCPMC12046795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.