Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312721›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2025

Prevalence and risk factors for loneliness among individuals with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anggi Lukman Wicaksana, Renny Wulan Apriliyasari, Pei-Shan Tsai

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anggi Lukman WicaksanaSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No. 250 Wuxing Street, Xinyi District, Taipei City, 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-8830
Renny Wulan ApriliyasariDepartment of Nursing, Institut Teknologi Kesehatan Cendekia Utama Kudus, Kudus, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-9423-7508
Pei-Shan TsaiSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No. 250 Wuxing Street, Xinyi District, Taipei City, 110, Taiwan. ptsai@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0003-1274-574X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness is more pronounced in individuals with diabetes; however, limited studies have investigated loneliness and its risk factors. This study estimated the pooled prevalence of loneliness and identified its risk factors in individuals with diabetes.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted. CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to September 22, 2023. We systematically searched and analyzed 10 studies involving 6036 individuals with diabetes to determine the pooled prevalence of loneliness. Five studies provided information on risk factors. Using a random-effects model, we calculated prevalence rates and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsThe overall prevalence of loneliness was 31.1% and severe loneliness was 4.6%. White race, lower education level, middle income, low income, longer diabetes duration, lower cognitive function, living alone, previous loneliness experience, and depression were identified as significant risk factors for loneliness in individuals with diabetes.

conclusionOver 30% of individuals with diabetes experience loneliness. Several sociodemographic factors, low cognitive function, and depression are risk factors for loneliness.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusLonelinessDepressionHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsDiabetes mellitusLonelinessMeta-analysisPrevalencePsychological distressPsychosocialRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40312721
PMCPMC12044816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.