ReviewPediatric rheumatology online journal2025
Developing consensus outcome measures in juvenile systemic sclerosis: a global survey of pediatric rheumatologists and literature review.
Review in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Juvenile Systemic Sclerosis in a Single Center: Clinical Features, Capillaroscopic Findings, Immunological Profile, and Treatment Outcomes-A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Anti-CD19 CAR T cells for pediatric patients with treatment-refractory autoimmune diseases.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Correction: Developing consensus outcome measures in juvenile systemic sclerosis: a global survey of pediatric rheumatologists and literature review.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundJuvenile systemic sclerosis (JSSc) is a rare multisystemic disease with high morbidity and mortality rates. Treatment options remain limited, and there is a significant unmet need for effective therapies. This study aims to address this gap by investigating current JSSc management practices and identifying key outcome measures that can be used to inform the development of standardized assessment tools for future clinical trials.
methodsA web-based survey was distributed to pediatric rheumatologists to assess cardiopulmonary assessment standard of care practices and immunosuppressive treatment use in JSSc. Respondents were categorized by region (North America, Europe, Latin America, and Asia/Africa), and country income level. A scoping literature review was conducted using the PRISMA-SCR framework to identify outcome measures for six domains in SSc.
resultsOne hundred forty-one pediatric rheumatologists from 26 countries completed the survey. Significant variations in JSSc cardiopulmonary assessment practices across regions and income levels were noted. Respondents in North America and Europe reported using pulmonary function tests (PFTs) with diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) more frequently than those in Latin America, or Asia/Africa (p < 0.001). The 6-min walk test (6MWT) was used less frequently by respondents in North America than other regions (p = 0.004). Use of oral corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide for treatment of JSSc varies significantly based on country income level, with higher usage in low- and middle-income nations. The scoping review identified 848 relevant articles for data extraction (ranging from 36 to 156 per domain) from a pool of 31,825 records, which were screened in multiple stages by 39 investigators.
conclusionWe found significant variability in JSSc assessment and treatment preferences, influenced by geography and income. This highlights the urgent need for international collaboration and standardized approaches in JSSc care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.