Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312701›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Factors influencing the pre-hospital management of civilian burn mass casualty incidents in the 21st century: a scoping review.

Andreas Lindquist, Resha Al-Azzawi, Torsten Risør, Lasse Raatiniemi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreas LindquistDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Pb 6050 Langnes, N-9037, Tromsoe, Norway. andreas.lindquist@fimnet.fi.
Resha Al-AzzawiDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsoe, Norway.
Torsten RisørSection for General Practice & Research Unit for General Practice Zealand, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lasse RaatiniemiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Pb 6050 Langnes, N-9037, Tromsoe, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBurn mass casualty incidents (BMCI) are unique and catastrophic events that are uncommon but recurring and comprehensively challenge all emergency services involved. The causes range from forces of nature to accidental or intentional explosions, indoor fires and chemical burns. A growing population, climate change exacerbated fire weather, increasing industrial activity and a rising threat of worldwide transnational terrorism all increase the risk of BMCIs. Emergency response strategies are thus of critical importance and can be improved upon by learning from previous incidents through the identification of recurrent themes.

objectivesIdentify, categorise, and describe key themes and factors reported as having a favourable or detrimental influence on the professional management of civilian BMCIs. MATERIALS AND

methodsA scoping review following the Arksey and O'Malley framework with enhancements by Levac, Colquhoun and O'Brien, and PRISMA-ScR, was conducted using six electronic databases, including a search for grey literature from January 2001 to March 2024. A total of 51 documents, containing descriptions, discussions, and/or experiences of the pre-hospital management of burn mass casualty incidents in civilian, non-war settings, were included and analysed using thematic analysis for qualitative data and labelled for themes and factors.

resultsThirteen key themes and 71 factors were identified to influence the pre-hospital management of BMCIs. The key themes were Command, Communication, Contextual, Education, Environment, Evacuation, Fortuity, Human Factors, Preparedness, Response Tactics, Safety, Triage, and Volunteer. The 71 identified factors were for example self-evacuation, varied non-medical transport methods, traffic congestion and decontamination.

conclusionThe identified themes and factors provide insights from real-life incidents on what is reported to influence the situation at hand. The identified factors can be used to target specific areas for further improvement in future BMCIs, particularly in preparedness planning and training, for example by taking self-evacuation into account in future disaster plans.

Indexed as

BurnsDisaster PlanningEmergency Medical ServicesMass Casualty IncidentsHumansTriageBurn mass casualty incidentsDisaster managementEmergency responseEmergency servicesMass casualty incidentsPre-hospital managementPreparedness planningResponse strategy

Identifiers

PMID40312701
PMCPMC12044938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.