ArticleBMC health services research2025
A case study of the co-creation of the PrEP-SIC: a roadmap to support introduction of pre-exposure prophylaxis into new settings.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation timelines across conditions: a universal Stages of Implementation CompletionImplementation science : IS · 2026Article
- The great mismatch: unfulfilled promise of biomedical HIV prevention.AIDS (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective biomedical intervention to prevent HIV, however uptake of PrEP across the United States has been slow and uneven. Understanding "what it takes" to implement PrEP so that it reaches those groups with the highest rates of new diagnoses is a critically important and understudied question. This descriptive case study details the development of an implementation science tool to guide the introduction of PrEP into new settings.
methodsThe Universal Stages of Implementation Completion (U-SIC) was customized for the provision of PrEP services (PrEP-SIC) by using subject matter expert recommendations to operationalize PrEP implementation processes into discreet activities. Six clinical sites used the PrEP-SIC retrospectively and prospectively to assess the extent to which the PrEP-SIC activities mapped onto their experience of introducing oral daily, event-driven, and injectable PrEP into their clinical settings. Interviews with site champions and PrEP-SIC data, including proportion of activities completed, were analyzed to refine the PrEP-SIC and identify patterns of implementation behavior.
resultsFive themes emerged about the accuracy of the PrEP-SIC to capture real world implementation processes: (1) Some PrEP-SIC activities, such as generating a costing plan, are not reflected in real-world implementation; (2) Sites do not define sustainment as achieving a set of quantitative program goals, but rather as being able to continue a program through staffing turnovers and shortages; (3) Written protocols and reviewing clinic data for program improvement were identified as two key factors that differentiate sites that reached sustainment from sites that did not; (4) The PrEP-SIC is assessed as somewhat useful to guide introduction of PrEP, but pairing the tool with technical assistance or coaching would optimize its utility; (5) Implementation is cyclical and recursive and pre-implementation activities may need to be revisited over time to ensure sustainment.
conclusionsThe case study has resulted in a PrEP-SIC that accurately captures an idealized implementation process. Using a well-defined set of implementation activities as a roadmap with supportive services to clinics, like technical assistance or implementation coaching, could direct implementation efforts and facilitate the integration of PrEP into new clinical settings that reach the people who need PrEP the most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.