SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2025
An urgent call to publish COVID-19 trials: a systematic search revealed ZERO studies regarding the incidence of thromboembolic events in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-infected COVID-19 patients.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An urgent call to publish COVID-19 trials: a systematic search revealed ZERO studies regarding the incidence of thromboembolic events in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-infected COVID-19 patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- A comprehensive assessment of the impact of COVID variant and vaccination on venous thromboembolism and mortality.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Prevalence of thromboembolic events in critically-ill COVID-19 patients infected with Omicron: results from the French prospective, multicenter SEVARVIR cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 has been associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications, particularly in hospitalized patients. While early research focused on pre-Omicron variants, the thrombotic risk associated with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infections remains unclear. Given the evolving nature of the pandemic, it is critical to assess whether current anticoagulation recommendations remain appropriate.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of clinical studies to determine the incidence of thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants. The main outcome was thromboembolic events within 28 days of infection, using objective diagnostic criteria. We systematically searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, covering multiple databases, for studies published between November 30, 2021, and January 31, 2024. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers, and missing data were requested from study authors.
resultsOur search identified 7843 records, of which 238 underwent full-text screening. Ultimately, no study met our inclusion criteria due to issues such as lack of Omicron-specific data, inadequate reporting of diagnostic methods, and failure to specify the timing of outcome assessment. Despite contacting study authors, no additional eligible data were obtained.
conclusionThere is currently no high-quality evidence on the incidence of thromboembolic events in Omicron-infected COVID-19 patients. The absence of relevant studies highlights a critical research gap and raises concerns about the applicability of current anticoagulation guidelines. Future studies should stratify outcomes by SARS-CoV-2 variant, ensure transparent reporting, and provide rigorous diagnostic confirmation to guide clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.