ArticleBMC public health2025
Assessing the Italian version of the respiratory symptom experience scale (IT-RSES) in smokers and former smokers: a validation study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmoking causes respiratory symptoms, and research suggests these improve with cessation or switching to less harmful nicotine products. The Respiratory Symptom Experience Scale (RSES) was developed and validated for the purpose of assessing these such symptoms online in an English-speaking American sample. This study aimed to develop and validate an Italian version, the IT-RSES, administered via telephone interview, and, further, to use it to assess symptoms in smokers who had switched to e-cigarettes or to heated tobacco products (HTPs).
methodsAfter translation into Italian, the IT-RSES was administered by phone interview to 750 Italian participants in 5 tobacco use groups (150 each never-smokers, former smokers not using alternative products, HTP users, e-cigarette users, and continuing smokers) who also reported any history of diagnoses with relevant medical conditions. Psychometric analyses examined scale factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity. Analyses controlling for age and for years smoking compared symptoms across tobacco use groups.
resultsFactor analyses confirmed the IT-RSES' unidimensionality (factor one accounting for 74.2% of the variance; all factor loadings > 0.80). Internal-consistency reliability was high ( Cronbach's alpha = 0.91). IT-RSES scores correlated significantly with years of smoking (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001), and were higher in individuals with respiratory conditions (2.02 vs. 1.36, SE = 0.05, significant by THSD). Discriminant validity was demonstrated by higher scores in smokers compared to never-smokers, even among those without respiratory conditions. After adjustment for years of smoking, former smokers, HTP users and e-cigarette users had lower scores than smokers (m = 2.17 vs. 1.49, SE = 0.06, p < 0.05, THSD; 1.63 vs. 2.16, SE = 0.06, THSD) and did not significantly differ from each other.
conclusionsThe results support the reliability and validity of the IT-RSES, suggesting its utility for assessing respiratory symptoms in smokers, and former smoker who stopped smoking and were using e-cigarettes or HTPs. The scores of former smokers are similar to those not using these products, and lower than smokers', suggests that HTPs and e-cigarettes do not add materially to respiratory symptoms when smokers stop smoking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.