ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Artifact estimation network for MR images: effectiveness of batch normalization and dropout layers.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A two-stage PET/MRI attenuation-correction workflow for pseudo-CT and AC PET synthesis with GUI-based inference.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- A Fundamental Study on the Removal of Vascular Pulsation Artifacts Using U-Net-Based Deep Neural Network.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool for medical diagnosis. However, artifacts may degrade images obtained through MRI, especially owing to patient movement. Existing methods that mitigate the artifact problem are subject to limitations including extended scan times. Deep learning architectures, such as U-Net, may be able to address these limitations. Optimizing deep learning networks with batch normalization (BN) and dropout layers enhances their convergence and accuracy. However, the influence of this strategy on U-Net has not been explored for artifact removal.
methodsThis study developed a U-Net-based regression network for the removal of motion artifacts and investigated the impact of combining BN and dropout layers as a strategy for this purpose. A Transformer-based network from a previous study was also adopted for comparison. In total, 1200 images (with and without motion artifacts) were used to train and test three variations of U-Net.
resultsThe evaluation results demonstrated a significant improvement in network accuracy when BN and dropout layers were implemented. The peak signal-to-noise ratio of the reconstructed images was approximately doubled and the structural similarity index was improved by approximately 10% compared with those of the artifact images.
conclusionsAlthough this study was limited to phantom images, the same strategy may be applied to more complex tasks, such as those directed at improving the quality of MR and CT images. We conclude that the accuracy of motion artifact removal can be improved by integrating BN and dropout layers into a U-Net-based network, with due consideration of the correct location and dropout rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.