SynthesisNeuropsychology review2026
Cortical Gradients Support Mental Time Travel into the Past and Future: Evidence from Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Echoes of time: Organization of episodic autobiographical memories in the brain according to their remoteness.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Defining imagination: a conceptual mapping and provisional model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A longstanding issue concerns the extent to which episodic autobiographical memory (EAM) and episodic future thinking (EFT) are the expression of the same cognitive ability and may be dissociated at the neural level. Here, we provided an updated picture of overlaps and dissociations between brain networks supporting EAM and EFT, using Activation Likelihood Estimation. Moreover, we tested the hypothesis that spatial gradients characterize the transition between activations associated with the two domains, in line with accounts positing a transition in the relative predominance of their features and process components. We showed the involvement of a core network across EAM and EFT, including midline structures, the bilateral hippocampus/parahippocampus, angular gyrus and anterior middle temporal gyrus (aMTG) and the left superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Contrast analyses highlighted a cluster in the right aMTG significantly more activated during EFT compared with EAM. Finally, gradiental transitions were found in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, left SFG, and bilateral aMTG. Results show that differences between EAM and EFT may arise at least partially through the organization of specific regions of common activation along functional gradients, and help to advocate between different theoretical accounts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.