Trial reportNature medicine2025
Infant mental health services for birth and foster families of maltreated pre-school children in foster care (BeST
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02653716 (BeST?- The Best Services Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
BeST?- The Best Services Trial (BeST?): Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the New Orleans Intervention Model for Infant Mental Health
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Economic evaluation of a complex intervention to improve the mental health of maltreated children in foster care (BeST? Services trial).Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Trial
- A longitudinal study examining emotional, behavioural and attachment disorder symptoms of care-experienced young children: the role of early adversity and age at entry to care.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- A longitudinal study examining the effect of carer-child relationship quality on child's emotional and behavioural difficulties while in care.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Mental health of children and young people in the WHO Europe region.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
- The quandary of high-quality evaluation in complex child welfare systems.Nature medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children entering foster care are at high risk of poor mental health. In this single-blind, cluster-randomized phase 3 trial, 382 families with 488 0-5-year-old children, entering foster care, were randomized to the New Orleans Intervention Model (NIM) or social work services as usual (SAU). NIM offers infant mental health assessment (~3 months) and treatment (6-9 months) to children and to their birth and foster families, aiming to improve child mental health and recommend return home or adoption. The principal outcome was child mental health, as measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Total Difficulties (SDQ-TD) scale at 2.5 years after study entry. In total, 286 families (149 NIM and 137 SAU, 367 children) were followed-up (79.4%). Intention-to-treat analysis found no intervention effect of NIM: mean (s.d.) SDQ-TD NIM, 11.5 (7.6); SAU, 11.1 (7.2); adjusted mean difference (NIM - SAU), 1.4; 95% confidence interval (-0.63, 3.53); P = 0.17. No within-trial effects for primary or secondary outcomes were observed. Despite its components being delivered to a high standard, the UK legal context surrounding NIM led to it being impossible to deliver to all eligible families, and less than 70% of families received the intervention to which they were randomized. Future research will be required to evaluate NIM in more favorable social and legal contexts. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02653716 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.