Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312490›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

External validation of an RSNA 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge high performing machine learning model in the detection and grading of splenic injuries on CT.

Anish Kirpalani, Théo Viel, Zixuan Hu, Hui Ming Lin, Sebastiaan Hermans, David Gomez, Robert Moreland, Shobhit Mathur, Aaditeya Jhaveri, Matthew Wu and 4 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anish KirpalaniDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Théo VielNVIDIA, Paris, France.
Zixuan HuThe Edward S. Rogers Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-7968-8757
Hui Ming LinDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9598-3921
Sebastiaan HermansDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7967-5224
David GomezLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0926-2547
Robert MorelandDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5456-1637
Shobhit MathurDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7334-3341
Aaditeya JhaveriDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1215-072X
Matthew WuDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paraskevi A VlachouDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6058-2896
Monica TafurDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ervin SejdićThe Edward S. Rogers Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4987-8298
Errol ColakDepartment of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Errol.Colak@unityhealth.to.ORCID 0000-0002-3771-7975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to validate the performance of an award-winning machine learning (ML) model from the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge in detecting splenic injuries on CT scans using a large, geographically and temporally distinct external dataset.

methodA single-center retrospective study was conducted using an external dataset comprising 1216 CT scans (608 positive and 608 negative for splenic injuries). The ML model, trained on the RSNA Abdominal Traumatic Injury CT (RATIC) dataset, employs a multi-component pipeline including 2D MaxVit, 2.5D CoatNet with LSTM for study-level predictions. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, F1 score, and AUC.

resultsThe ML model achieved an AUC of 0.931 (95% CI: 0.917, 0.945) for binary classification of splenic injuries, with an accuracy of 0.849 (95% CI: 0.827, 0.868), sensitivity of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.711, 0.780), and specificity of 0.951 (95% CI: 0.930, 0.965). For high-grade splenic injuries, the model achieved an AUC of 0.950 (95% CI: 0.932, 0.968), accuracy of 0.928 (95% CI: 0.912, 0.941), sensitivity of 0.719 (95% CI: 0.643, 0.784), and specificity of 0.958 (95% CI: 0.944, 0.968).

conclusionThe ML model shows strong, reliable performance and generalizability in detecting and grading splenic injuries on CT scans. This supports its potential clinical application, particularly for quick and accurate diagnosis in splenic trauma patients, and highlights the value of RSNA AI challenges in advancing clinical research and applications in medical imaging.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesMachine LearningSpleenTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAASTArtificial intelligenceComputed tomography (CT)External validationMachine learningSplenic injuryTrauma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.