Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312470›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Criminal emotion detection framework using convolutional neural network for public safety.

Jay Raval, Nilesh Kumar Jadav, Sudeep Tanwar, Giovanni Pau, Fayez Alqahtani, Amr Tolba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jay RavalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute of Technology, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382481, India.
Nilesh Kumar JadavDepartment of Computer Engineering - AI, ML, & DS, Marwadi University, Rajkot, 360003, India. nilesh.jadav@marwadieducation.edu.in.
Sudeep TanwarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute of Technology, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382481, India. sudeep.tanwar@nirmauni.ac.in.
Giovanni PauFaculty of Engineering and Architecture, Kore University of Enna, 94100, Enna, Italy.
Fayez AlqahtaniSoftware Engineering Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 12372, Saudi Arabia.
Amr TolbaComputer Science Department, Community College, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11437, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

King Saud University RSPD2025R681Università degli Studi di Enna Kore 2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of rapid societal modernization, the issue of crime stands as an intrinsic facet, demanding our attention and consideration. As our communities evolve and adopt technological advancements, the dynamic landscape of criminal activities becomes an essential aspect that requires careful examination and proactive approaches for public safety application. In this paper, we proposed a collaborative approach to detect crime patterns and criminal emotions with the aim of enhancing judiciary decision-making. For the same, we utilized two standard datasets - a crime dataset comprised of different features of crime. Further, the emotion dataset has 135 classes of emotion that help the AI model to efficiently find criminal emotions. We adopted a convolutional neural network (CNN) to get first trained on crime datasets to bifurcate crime and non-crime images. Once the crime is detected, criminal faces are extracted using the region of interest and stored in a directory. Different CNN architectures, such as LeNet-5, VGGNet, RestNet-50, and basic CNN, are used to detect different emotions of the face. The trained CNN models are used to detect criminal emotion and enhance judiciary decision-making. The proposed framework is evaluated with different evaluation metrics, such as training accuracy, loss, optimizer performance, precision-recall curve, model complexity, training time, and inference time. In crime detection, the CNN model achieves a remarkable accuracy of 92.45% and in criminal emotion detection, LeNet-5 outperforms other CNN architectures by offering an accuracy of 98.6%.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworksCriminalsEmotionsCrimeHumansNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networksDeep learningFace emotion detectionPublic safety

Identifiers

PMID40312470
PMCPMC12046053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.