Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312434›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Nursing theories as guidance for autonomy support in activities of daily living: a scoping review.

Melissa Botana Gronek, Michel Bleijlevens, Stan Vluggen, Esmee Moonen, Aileen Van Dijk, Petra Erkens, Sandra Zwakhalen, Jan Hamers, Judith Meijers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melissa Botana GronekLiving Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, GT, 6229, The Netherlands. melissa.botanagronek@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Michel BleijlevensLiving Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, GT, 6229, The Netherlands.
Stan VluggenLiving Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, GT, 6229, The Netherlands.
Esmee MoonenLiving Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, GT, 6229, The Netherlands.
Aileen Van DijkLiving Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, GT, 6229, The Netherlands.
Petra ErkensLiving Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, GT, 6229, The Netherlands.
Sandra ZwakhalenLiving Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, GT, 6229, The Netherlands.
Jan HamersLiving Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, GT, 6229, The Netherlands.
Judith MeijersLiving Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, GT, 6229, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupporting others with self-care activities lies at the core of nursing practices. While supporting autonomy within essential care is important, there remains a lack of knowledge on what autonomy comprises and how nurses can demonstrate autonomy-supportive behavior. In order to find guidance, we consulted nursing theories that have shaped the profession. This study aims to explore in what way autonomy is described within the nursing theories and how they describe what nurses could/should undertake to demonstrate autonomy-supportive behaviors within activities of daily living.

methodsA scoping review was performed, in adherence to the Johanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, adhering to the EQUATOR guidelines, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews, PRISMA-ScR, in order to report the scoping review results. Nursing theories were identified through textbooks, PubMed and expert feedback during the period of April to July 2023. No publication year restrictions were applied. Theories (writings that informed, under pinned, or described nursing care) were included if published in English or Dutch. Data extraction was carried out, performing a content analysis using inductive coding to identify categories of autonomy-supportive behavior.

resultsOf 25 nursing theories identified, nine met the inclusion criteria. While none provided explicit definitions of autonomy-supportive behavior, autonomy was described as encompassing being oneself, having freedom and control over one's life, expressing and making choices, and engagement in carrying out actions. Six categories of autonomy-supportive behavior were identified: being aware of one's own behavior, respecting individual uniqueness, fostering interpersonal connections, facilitating open communication, allowing the other person to choose the best action, and collaborative guidance and assistance.

conclusionThis review explored how autonomy is defined in prominent nursing theories and how nurses can foster autonomy in activities of daily living. Despite its central role in healthcare, no consistent definition of autonomy or autonomy-supportive behavior was identified. While nursing theories provide valuable insights, these remain largely theoretical and lack practical applicability. Further research is needed to translate these concepts into actionable strategies for everyday practice.

Indexed as

Activities of daily livingAutonomyAutonomy supportLong-term careNursing theoryPatient autonomy

Identifiers

PMID40312434
PMCPMC12044891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.