ArticleScientific reports2025
A grip strength prediction tool for older adults based on logistic regression: construction, validation, and clinical application value.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between the uric acid to prealbumin ratio and frailty, muscle strength, and malnutrition risk in older geriatric outpatients: a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Personalized Risk Prediction: Developing an Explainable Sarcopenia Model for Older European Adults with Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Trajectories of grip strength decline and risk of new-onset cardiovascular disease: evidence from the HRS and ELSA cohorts.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Handgrip strength is a key indicator of overall health in older adults, and its decline is linked to various adverse health outcomes. Despite numerous studies on factors influencing handgrip strength, few attempts have integrated multiple factors into a practical clinical tool. This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram based on a logistic regression model to predict the risk of low handgrip strength in older adults. Using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), 1138 participants were included. Firth-adjusted logistic regression identified predictors of low handgrip strength, with variable selection based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Model performance was assessed using calibration curves, ROC curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Internal validation was performed with 10-fold cross-validation and bootstrapping, determining the optimal risk threshold. Key predictors identified included age, chronic disease history, marital status, lifestyle, education, BMI, activities of daily living, and glycated hemoglobin. The simplified model exhibited good discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.78) and calibration performance. The optimal threshold (0.40) yielded sensitivity of 72.5% and specificity of 69.8%. Decision curve analysis confirmed significant net benefit within the clinically relevant threshold range. The nomogram provides a practical tool for identifying at-risk individuals and guiding intervention, integrating modifiable and non-modifiable factors for personalized risk assessment and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.