ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and characterization of starch bioplastics as a sustainable alternative for packaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial Cellulose- and Laponite-Reinforced Corn Starch Bioplastics for Sustainable Packaging.Polymers · 2026Article
- Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB): Production, Properties, Modification Strategies, Additive Manufacturing, Biodegradation, and Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Polyhydroxyalkanoate/seashell powder biocomposites with degradability and 3D printing applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Understanding bio-based polymers: A study of origins, properties, biodegradation and their impact on health and the environment.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- Sustainable bioplastics manufacturing from renewable sources.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- Review
- The quintessence of algal biomass in bioplastic production: insightful advancement and sustainable use.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the growing environmental concerns of petroleum-based plastics, there has been a surge of interest in biodegradable alternatives. In this study, starch-based bioplastic was prepared using biopolymers extracted from corn and potato and the biopolymer was mixed with calcium carbonate (filler) and plasticizers (glycerol-sorbitol) and evaluated. For the fabricated formulation, Taguchi analysis gave an optimal formulation of 9 g corn starch, 9 mL glycerol, and 2.5 g calcium carbonate, having a well-balanced mechanical strength, flexibility, and biodegradability. The results showed a major improvement in tensile strength of 22.5% (6.08 MPa) and a 31.7% increase in Young's modulus (0.103 GPa), compared to the least effective sample. In biodegradation tests, the degradation rate of C1 (66.68%) was the fastest, while C3 had a slower rate (29.08%). Moisture absorption varied considerably, with sample COM3 absorbing 25.92% compared to just 4.35% for P3, while P3 absorbed only 4.35%. Among compounds, the higher and lower percentage for water solubility were for P1 (20.50%) and C3 (49.04%) respectively. These results underscore the potential of starch-based bioplastics for sustainable packaging, offering an environmentally friendly option compared to traditional plastics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.