ArticleNature communications2025
Conveying tactile object characteristics through customized intracortical microstimulation of the human somatosensory cortex.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomimetic stimulation patterns drive natural artificial touch percepts using intracortical microstimulation in humans.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Trial
- Learning induces activation-mechanism-dependent neural plasticity in an intracortical microstimulation task.Science advances · 2026Article
- Trends in neuroprosthetic technologies to restore sensations.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Review
- Advances in neuroprostheses: interfaces, materials, and applications.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- Intracortical Microstimulation in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Evoking Perception and Plasticity.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Optimization frameworks for bespoke sensory encoding in neuroprosthetics.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- Investigating the spatial limits of somatotopic and depth-dependent sensory discrimination stimuli in rats via intracortical microstimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex can evoke tactile percepts in people with spinal cord injury, providing a means to restore touch. While location and intensity can be reliably conveyed, two issues that prevent creating more complex naturalistic sensations are a lack of methods to effectively scan the large stimulus parameter space and difficulties with assessing percept quality. Here, we address both challenges with an experimental paradigm that enables three male individuals with tetraplegia to control their stimulation parameters in a blinded fashion to create sensations for different virtual objects. Using this method, participants can reliably create object-specific sensations and report vivid object-appropriate characteristics. Moreover, both linear classifiers and participants can match stimulus profiles with their respective objects significantly above chance without any visual cues. Confusion between two sensations increases as the associated objects share more tactile characteristics. We conclude that while visual information contributes to the experience of the artificially evoked sensations, microstimulation in the somatosensory cortex itself can evoke intuitive percepts with a variety of tactile properties. This self-guided stimulation approach may be used to effectively characterize percepts from future stimulation paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.