ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
A hybrid approach for binary and multi-class classification of voice disorders using a pre-trained model and ensemble classifiers.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic potential of a panel of acoustic/aerodynamic voice markers in patients with dysphonia: a cluster analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence-based audio and speech processing have increasingly focused on the binary and multi-class classification of voice disorders. Despite progress, achieving high accuracy in multi-class classification remains challenging. This paper proposes a novel hybrid approach using a two-stage framework to enhance voice disorders classification performance, and achieve state-of-the-art accuracies in multi-class classification. Our hybrid approach, combines deep learning features with various powerful classifiers. In the first stage, high-level feature embeddings are extracted from voice data spectrograms using a pre-trained VGGish model. In the second stage, these embeddings are used as input to four different classifiers: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and an Ensemble Classifier (EC). Experiments are conducted on a subset of the Saarbruecken Voice Database (SVD) for male, female, and combined speakers. For binary classification, VGGish-SVM achieved the highest accuracy for male speakers (82.45% for healthy vs. disordered; 75.45% for hyperfunctional dysphonia vs. vocal fold paresis), while VGGish-EC performed best for female speakers (71.54% for healthy vs. disordered; 68.42% for hyperfunctional dysphonia vs. vocal fold paresis). In multi-class classification, VGGish-SVM outperformed other models, achieving mean accuracies of 77.81% for male speakers, 63.11% for female speakers, and 70.53% for combined genders. We conducted a comparative analysis against related works, including the Mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC), MFCC-glottal features, and features extracted using the wav2vec and HuBERT models with SVM classifier. Results demonstrate that our hybrid approach consistently outperforms these models, especially in multi-class classification tasks. The results show the feasibility of a hybrid framework for voice disorder classification, offering a foundation for refining automated tools that could support clinical assessments with further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.