ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Identification of relevant features using SEQENS to improve supervised machine learning models predicting AML treatment outcome.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gradual spatial constraint feature selection for robust biomarker discovery in high-dimensional gene expression data.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for complications in patients with acute leukemia based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThis study has two main objectives. First, to evaluate a feature selection methodology based on SEQENS, an algorithm for identifying relevant variables. Second, to validate machine learning models that predict the risk of complications in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using data available at diagnosis. Predictions are made at three time points: 90 days, six months, and one year post-diagnosis. These objectives represent fundamental steps toward the development of a tool to assist clinicians in therapeutic decision-making and provide insights into the risk factors associated with AML complications.
methodsA dataset of 568 patients, including demographic, clinical, genetic (VAF), and cytogenetic information, was created by combining data from Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid, Spain) and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (Valencia, Spain). Feature selection based on an enhanced version of SEQENS was conducted for each time point, followed by the comparison of four classifiers (XGBoost, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Logistic Regression and Decision Tree) to assess the impact of feature selection on model performance.
resultsSEQENS identified different relevant features for each prediction horizon, with Age, TP53, - 7/7Q, and EZH2 consistently relevant across all time points. The models were evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation, XGBoost achieve the highest average ROC-AUC scores of 0.81, 0.84, and 0.82 for 90-day, 6-month, and 1-year predictions, respectively. Generally, performance remained stable or improved after applying SEQENS-based feature selection. Evaluation on an external test set of 54 patients yielded ROC-AUC scores of 0.72 (90-day), 0.75 (6-month), and 0.68 (1-year).
conclusionsThe models achieved performance levels that suggest they could serve as therapeutic decision support tools at different times after diagnosis. The selected variables align with the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 risk classification, and the SEQENS-based feature selection effectively reduced the feature set while maintaining prediction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.