ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
A single worm-like structure in a urine collection bag: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive bias in veterinary clinical decision-making: Antemortem misdiagnosis of suspected giant kidney worm (Dioctophyme renale) in Australia.Australian veterinary journal · 2026Article
- An unusual case of suspected ectopic parasitic infection in urine: The irreplaceable role of clinical parasitologist.Tropical parasitologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe presence of a foreign body resembling a worm in a urine collection bag should lead to etiological investigation, as it may not be a parasite. It is thus important to consider the context and origin of the patient, together with the size, length, appearance, and characteristics of the suspected worm. CASE PRESENTATION: The presence of an apparently mobile black filament resembling a worm was reported in the urine collection bag of a 77-year-old African male resident of our long-term care facility. We initially suspected a parasitic infection. The description of this foreign body suggested Dioctophyma renale (giant kidney worm); however, the analysis of the sample concluded that it was a blood clot. Its worm-like appearance was due to the tube-like nature of the urethra, causing the blood clot to be squeezed into a worm-like shape.
conclusionSuch presentations can be misleading and may lead to unnecessary concern and investigations. A parasitological analysis can be essential for precise diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.