ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Identification of minimal residual disease using the clonesight test for ultrasensitive ctDNA detection to anticipate late relapse in early breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
- ctDNA in the Management of Resectable & Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven multimodal fusion for precision diagnosis and personalized management of breast cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Navigating the Metabolic-Genomic Paradigm: Mitochondrial Reprogramming as a Driver of Cancer Plasticity.Oncology research · 2026Review
- From detection to action: ctDNA-MRD surveillance and translational strategies in early breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly-stage breast cancer (BC) diagnosis significantly reduces mortality, yet relapse remains a concern due to undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD). Liquid biopsies offer real-time insights into tumor dynamics, aiding MRD detection and therapy response evaluation. However, MRD detection is challenging due to low tumor DNA levels in circulation.
methodsThis prospective study included 20 HR + BC patients who had completed at least 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Plasma samples were collected every 6 months over a median follow-up period of 2 years. Tumor-specific somatic variants identified through tumor tissue sequencing served as biomarkers for a patient-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay (CloneSight), which utilized a multiplex PCR-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflow.
resultsctDNA was detected in patients who experienced clinical relapse, with positivity observed up to 68 months (5.7 years) prior to overt recurrence, highlighting its potential for early relapse identification. In non-relapsed patients, ctDNA remained undetectable in 93% of cases, reflecting a potential high level of specificity. The assay detected ctDNA in 50% of relapsed patients, while no ctDNA signal was identified in the majority of non-relapsed cases.
conclusionOur exploratory findings indicate that CloneSight could be a promising tool for MRD detection and relapse prediction, providing a cost-effective, patient-informed approach to ctDNA monitoring. The ability of this approach to detect relapse prior to clinical recurrence suggests its potential relevance in improving patient monitoring. These findings suggest that ctDNA-based MRD assays could play a role in future surveillance strategies for HR + BC, though further studies in larger cohorts are needed to confirm their clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.