Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312346›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025

Identification of minimal residual disease using the clonesight test for ultrasensitive ctDNA detection to anticipate late relapse in early breast cancer.

Iñaki Comino-Méndez, Jesús Velasco-Suelto, Javier Pascual, Esperanza López-López, Maria Elena Quirós-Ortega, Celia Gaona-Romero, Alejandro Martín-Muñoz, Patricia Losana, Yanira Heredia, Emilio Alba and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Iñaki Comino-MéndezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010, Malaga, Spain. inaki.comino@ibima.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-9432
Jesús Velasco-SueltoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010, Malaga, Spain.
Javier PascualMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010, Malaga, Spain.
Esperanza López-LópezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010, Malaga, Spain.
Maria Elena Quirós-OrtegaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010, Malaga, Spain.
Celia Gaona-RomeroMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010, Malaga, Spain.
Alejandro Martín-MuñozHematological Malignancies Clinical Research Unit, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Patricia LosanaAltum Sequencing Co, Madrid, Spain.
Yanira HerediaAltum Sequencing Co, Madrid, Spain.
Emilio Alba *Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010, Malaga, Spain.
Angel Guerrero-Zotano *Medical Oncology Department, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain. angel.guerrero.zotano@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0318-9120

Funding

Pfizer Grant 53234235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly-stage breast cancer (BC) diagnosis significantly reduces mortality, yet relapse remains a concern due to undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD). Liquid biopsies offer real-time insights into tumor dynamics, aiding MRD detection and therapy response evaluation. However, MRD detection is challenging due to low tumor DNA levels in circulation.

methodsThis prospective study included 20 HR + BC patients who had completed at least 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Plasma samples were collected every 6 months over a median follow-up period of 2 years. Tumor-specific somatic variants identified through tumor tissue sequencing served as biomarkers for a patient-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay (CloneSight), which utilized a multiplex PCR-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflow.

resultsctDNA was detected in patients who experienced clinical relapse, with positivity observed up to 68 months (5.7 years) prior to overt recurrence, highlighting its potential for early relapse identification. In non-relapsed patients, ctDNA remained undetectable in 93% of cases, reflecting a potential high level of specificity. The assay detected ctDNA in 50% of relapsed patients, while no ctDNA signal was identified in the majority of non-relapsed cases.

conclusionOur exploratory findings indicate that CloneSight could be a promising tool for MRD detection and relapse prediction, providing a cost-effective, patient-informed approach to ctDNA monitoring. The ability of this approach to detect relapse prior to clinical recurrence suggests its potential relevance in improving patient monitoring. These findings suggest that ctDNA-based MRD assays could play a role in future surveillance strategies for HR + BC, though further studies in larger cohorts are needed to confirm their clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNANeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualAdultAgedFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNACirculating tumor DNAEarly breast cancerLiquid biopsyMinimal residual disease

Identifiers

PMID40312346
PMCPMC12044774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.