ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
The Norwegian national trauma registry: development process and essential data insights.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient-reported outcome measures within European cohorts of severely injured patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Pooled it
- Significant other reported outcome measures within European cohorts of severely injured patients: A systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating performance and potential clinical benefit of the Swedish On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model for prehospital field triage on Norwegian trauma data.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.Medical review (2021) · 2026Article
- Epidemiological trends in abdominal trauma in Norway (2015-2023): a national register-based cohort study of severity, population-adjusted incidence, and short-term outcomes.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- The potential impact of changing the Norwegian trauma Registry inclusion criteria for patients not admitted with trauma team activation: Identifying patient groups to be excluded and considering potential risks.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- The iCREATE registry: a model for strengthening injury surveillance in Republic of Moldova.Moldovan journal of health sciences = Revista de Stiinte ale Sanatatii din Moldova · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding trauma epidemiology, patient demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes is essential for optimising trauma systems. The Norwegian Trauma Registry (NTR) monitors and improves the Norwegian Trauma System, setting care standards and overseeing system development. The registry was officially recognised as a national register in 2013. This study outlines the establishment of the population-based national registry and provides an overview of selected data.
methodsNorway's trauma system includes trauma centres, acute care hospitals, and prehospital services. The registry collects injury details, clinical outcomes, and patient experiences. Local NTR databases that are linked to a central database are maintained at each hospital, and only certified data registrars can enter and validate data. This enables data linkages across hospitals. The NTR includes potentially severely injured patients but also includes undertriaged patients (defined as severely injured patients who are not met by a trauma team activation upon hospital arrival). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data from trauma patients registered between 2015 and 2023. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) from 2022 were also assessed.
resultsFrom 2015 to 2023, 78 275 trauma patients were recorded, with annual patient inclusion rising from 7586 in 2015 to 9759 in 2023. All 38 Norwegian hospitals contributed data in 2023. Median age was 41 years (IQR: 21-62), and 66.5% were men. The highest injury rate was among those aged 15-24 years. Penetrating injuries accounted for 4.6% of cases. Severely injured patients with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) ≥ 16 totalled 16 678 (21.3%), while 10 509 (13.4%) had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16. Polytrauma was identified in 3783 (4.9%) of patients using the Newcastle definition and in 2508 (3.2%) patients using the Berlin definition. In 2023, a trauma team was activated for 8731(89.4%) patients recorded in the registry. PROMs data from 2022 showed that 47.2% (1018/2157) of the patients reported anxiety or depression 12 months post-injury. Among those without physical injuries, 8.0% (11/138) were out of work or education. Of the severely injured patients (NISS ≥ 16) who were employed or in education prior to the injury, 26.4% (83/314) had not returned to work or education after 12 months.
conclusionsThe Norwegian Trauma Registry has been successfully implemented in all trauma hospitals in Norway, enabling comprehensive data collection to support trauma care improvements and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.