Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312265›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2025

The impact of extracellular matrix proteins on bovine fibro-adipogenic progenitor cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro.

Perri Gish, Madison Stewart, Brandon Khuu, Nathaniel Meyer, Payam Vahmani, Lucas Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Perri GishDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, & Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Madison StewartDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, & Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Brandon KhuuDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, & Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Nathaniel MeyerDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, & Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Payam VahmaniDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Lucas SmithDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, & Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7610-4231

Funding

Initiative for Maximizing Student Development at the University of California, Davis.T32GM135741 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ALDRIN V. GOMES, Manuel F Navedo · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
Interdependency of fibroadipogenic progenitors and extracellular matrix that drive skeletal muscle fibrosisR01AR079545 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LUCAS R SMITH · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) R01AR079545National Science Foundation (NSF) 2320899NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079545NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibro-adipogenic progenitor cells (FAPs) are mesenchymal stem cells that produce extracellular matrix (ECM) and intramuscular adipocytes in skeletal muscle. While FAPs have demonstrated responsiveness to their physical environment, there is limited knowledge of how the ECM substrate of FAPs impacts their differentiation, particularly in livestock animals. We hypothesized that the ECM substrate FAPs are cultured on will differentially impact their adherence, proliferation, and differentiation. Through an initial screen of 9 ECM proteins and their combinations, significant variation of bovine FAP attachment and differentiation across coatings was observed. The ECM substrates fibronectin, collagen 6, vitronectin, and a combination of fibronectin and collagen 6 were selected for further testing. Notably, fibronectin increased cell proliferation and attachment rates, without impairing FAP adipogenic or fibrogenic differentiation compared to the other coatings. Benefits of fibronectin were maintained at lower concentrations and when combined with less favorable coatings such as collagen 6. When assessed for their adipogenic potential on each coating at different substrate stiffnesses, lipid accumulation decreased with increasing substrate stiffness, while cell attachment increased on stiffer substrates. Overall, these results demonstrate the high responsiveness of FAPs to their ECM substrate, along with highlighting fibronectin as a preferred substrate for in vitro experiments with bovine FAPs.

Indexed as

AdipogenesisCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationExtracellular Matrix ProteinsMesenchymal Stem CellsAdipocytesAnimalsCattleCells, CulturedExtracellular MatrixFibronectinsExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFibronectinsbovineextracellular matrixfibro‐adipogenic progenitorfibronectinmesenchymal stem cell

Identifiers

PMID40312265
PMCPMC12045701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.