ArticlePhysiological reports2025
The impact of extracellular matrix proteins on bovine fibro-adipogenic progenitor cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanosignaling promotes macrophage apoptosis resistance in pulmonary fibrosisbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- The impact of extracellular matrix proteins on bovine fibro-adipogenic progenitor cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fibro-adipogenic progenitor cells (FAPs) are mesenchymal stem cells that produce extracellular matrix (ECM) and intramuscular adipocytes in skeletal muscle. While FAPs have demonstrated responsiveness to their physical environment, there is limited knowledge of how the ECM substrate of FAPs impacts their differentiation, particularly in livestock animals. We hypothesized that the ECM substrate FAPs are cultured on will differentially impact their adherence, proliferation, and differentiation. Through an initial screen of 9 ECM proteins and their combinations, significant variation of bovine FAP attachment and differentiation across coatings was observed. The ECM substrates fibronectin, collagen 6, vitronectin, and a combination of fibronectin and collagen 6 were selected for further testing. Notably, fibronectin increased cell proliferation and attachment rates, without impairing FAP adipogenic or fibrogenic differentiation compared to the other coatings. Benefits of fibronectin were maintained at lower concentrations and when combined with less favorable coatings such as collagen 6. When assessed for their adipogenic potential on each coating at different substrate stiffnesses, lipid accumulation decreased with increasing substrate stiffness, while cell attachment increased on stiffer substrates. Overall, these results demonstrate the high responsiveness of FAPs to their ECM substrate, along with highlighting fibronectin as a preferred substrate for in vitro experiments with bovine FAPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.