ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Functional and Regional Specificity of Noradrenergic Signaling for Encoding and Retrieval of Associative Recognition Memory in the Rat.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recognition of a familiar object in a novel location requires retrieval of the former object-place association and encoding of novel information. Such object-in-place (OiP) memory recruits a neural network including the hippocampus (HPC), medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and nucleus reuniens of the thalamus (NRe); however, the underlying cellular mechanisms are not understood. Locus ceruleus (LC) noradrenergic neurons signal novelty; thus here we focused on the contribution of LC-forebrain projections and noradrenaline (NA) receptor subtypes to OiP encoding compared with retrieval, using an arena-based OiP task in male rats. The NRe was found to receive a catecholaminergic input from LC, with the strongest innervation directed to rostral NRe. Interestingly optogenetic inactivation of the LC→NRe pathway impaired OiP retrieval but was without effect on encoding, while inactivation of the LC→HPC selectively impaired encoding. Consistent with this double dissociation, pharmacological blockade of NRe α1-adrenoreceptors selectively impaired memory retrieval, while blockade of HPC β-adrenoreceptors impaired encoding. Finally, pharmacological attenuation of noradrenergic signaling in the NRe and HPC through the infusion of the α2-adrenergic receptor agonist UK 14,304 impaired retrieval and encoding, respectively. Surprisingly, antagonism or agonism of adrenoreceptor subtypes in the mPFC had no effect on memory performance. Together these results reveal the importance of NA within the HPC and NRe for OiP, whereby selectivity of function is achieved via spatially distinct LC output projections and NA receptor subtypes consistent with a modular view of NA function. These results are also important in demonstrating the distinct neuronal mechanisms by which encoding and retrieval are achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.