Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312108›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Public-private dialogue: an essential approach to engage non-state actors in a mixed health system.

Barbara O'Hanlon, Aya Thabet, Sneha Kanneganti, David Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara O'HanlonGlobal Financing Facility Secretariat, World Bank Group, Washington, DC, USA.
Aya ThabetWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland aya_thabet894@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2084-3470
Sneha KannegantiGlobal Financing Facility Secretariat, World Bank Group, Washington, DC, USA.
David ClarkeWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5583-0779

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence shows that low-income and middle-income country (LMIC) governments are still facing challenges to systematically engage the private sector in health. Barriers to greater interactions between public and private health partners include mistrust of the private health sector's motives and misunderstanding of the profit motive, based on deep-rooted philosophical beliefs and personal experiences.This paper examines the implementation of public-private dialogue (PPD) as a means for addressing the aforementioned barriers facing the engagement of the private sector in health in LMICs. The paper responds to a research gap surrounding the process of conducting PPD in health by defining PPD, describing the associated risks and benefits learnt from country examples and providing tactics for leveraging the benefits while addressing the potential risks of PPD. The paper also emphasises the similarities between the process to conduct PPDs in health compared with other social and economic sectors, with the exception of one additional risk, namely 'institutional misalignment'. This additional risk observed in the health sector can be attributed to the limited capacity of Ministries of Health to govern the private sector and the diversity and fragmentation of private health sector entities.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePrivate SectorPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsDeveloping CountriesHumansHealth policyHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID40312108
PMCPMC12056621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.