ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Outcome of diabetic foot ulcers at a Tertiary Care Foot Centre in Pakistan.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of outcomes in patients with diabetic foot ulcers based on initial assessment at admission.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Offloading orthotic insoles on healing of diabetic foot ulcers: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Hospital burden, amputation risk, and mortality trends in diabetic foot patients: a retrospective public health analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Outcome of diabetic foot ulcers at a Tertiary Care Foot Centre in Pakistan.International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the frequency of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and its outcomes in association with lower extremity amputation (LEA). This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Baqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Pakistan. Patients with DFUs below the malleoli were included from 1st January to 31st December 2020. Data were extracted using the Health Management System. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed and managed through standardised methods. The primary endpoint was wound healing, with or without amputation, over a 1-year follow-up period. Amongst 1901 patients with DFUs, 1478 (77.8%) had infected DFUs and 594 (40.2%) had diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). The final analysis included 300 patients, divided into 'no amputation' (137, 45.6%), 'minor amputation' (134, 44.6%) and 'major amputation' (29, 9.6%) groups. Osteomyelitis distribution significantly influenced amputation patterns, particularly in the forefoot, which was involved in 73.7% of 'no amputation', 97.7% of 'minor amputation' and 58.6% of 'major amputation' cases. The 1st toe, 1st metatarsophalangeal joint and 5th toe were major contributors to forefoot amputations. This study signifies that DFO is quite prevalent in DFUs with forefoot osteomyelitis being the most common site. Moreover, the majority of DFO cases, require LEA including both minor and major amputations. These findings highlight the imperative for clinicians to adopt an early, multidisciplinary approach in the management of DFUs and hence DFO, aiming to prevent the onset of DFO and subsequent amputations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.