Trial reportThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2025
Long-term effects and effect heterogeneity of lifestyle and metformin interventions on type 2 diabetes incidence over 21 years in the US Diabetes Prevention Program randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2025. The graph read 6 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but it casts no vote: the report of the main result of NCT00004992 is not on the map. An erratum has been issued. It reports registered trial NCT00004992. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Ratios
During follow-up, compared with placebo, diabetes incidence rate was reduced in the original ILS group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.68 to 0.85], rate difference [RD] -1.59 cases [95% CI -2.25 to -0.93] per 100 person-years) and in the original metformin group (HR 0.83 [0.74 to 0.93], RD -1.17 [-1.85 to -0.49]), with corresponding increases in median diabetes-free survival of 3.5 years and 2.5 years, and mean diabetes-free survival of 2.0 years (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8) and 1.2 years (0.4 to 2.0), respectively.
During follow-up, compared with placebo, diabetes incidence rate was reduced in the original ILS group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.68 to 0.85], rate difference [RD] -1.59 cases [95% CI -2.25 to -0.93] per 100 person-years) and in the original metformin group (HR 0.83 [0.74 to 0.93], RD -1.17 [-1.85 to -0.49]), with corresponding increases in median diabetes-free survival of 3.5 years and 2.5 years, and mean diabetes-free survival of 2.0 years (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8) and 1.2 years (0.4 to 2.0), respectively.
Differences
During follow-up, compared with placebo, diabetes incidence rate was reduced in the original ILS group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.68 to 0.85], rate difference [RD] -1.59 cases [95% CI -2.25 to -0.93] per 100 person-years) and in the original metformin group (HR 0.83 [0.74 to 0.93], RD -1.17 [-1.85 to -0.49]), with corresponding increases in median diabetes-free survival of 3.5 years and 2.5 years, and mean diabetes-free survival of 2.0 years (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8) and 1.2 years (0.4 to 2.0), respectively.
During follow-up, compared with placebo, diabetes incidence rate was reduced in the original ILS group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.68 to 0.85], rate difference [RD] -1.59 cases [95% CI -2.25 to -0.93] per 100 person-years) and in the original metformin group (HR 0.83 [0.74 to 0.93], RD -1.17 [-1.85 to -0.49]), with corresponding increases in median diabetes-free survival of 3.5 years and 2.5 years, and mean diabetes-free survival of 2.0 years (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8) and 1.2 years (0.4 to 2.0), respectively.
During follow-up, compared with placebo, diabetes incidence rate was reduced in the original ILS group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.68 to 0.85], rate difference [RD] -1.59 cases [95% CI -2.25 to -0.93] per 100 person-years) and in the original metformin group (HR 0.83 [0.74 to 0.93], RD -1.17 [-1.85 to -0.49]), with corresponding increases in median diabetes-free survival of 3.5 years and 2.5 years, and mean diabetes-free survival of 2.0 years (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8) and 1.2 years (0.4 to 2.0), respectively.
During follow-up, compared with placebo, diabetes incidence rate was reduced in the original ILS group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.68 to 0.85], rate difference [RD] -1.59 cases [95% CI -2.25 to -0.93] per 100 person-years) and in the original metformin group (HR 0.83 [0.74 to 0.93], RD -1.17 [-1.85 to -0.49]), with corresponding increases in median diabetes-free survival of 3.5 years and 2.5 years, and mean diabetes-free survival of 2.0 years (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8) and 1.2 years (0.4 to 2.0), respectively.
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Diet, exercise & lifestyle×all-cause mortality
Does not voteOpen on the map →What to test next →1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
Metformin×all-cause mortality
Does not voteOpen on the map →What to test next →1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diabetes Prevention Program
Open the trial in the graphDiabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese classic prescriptions combined with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Dementia in type 2 diabetes: risk factors, disease processes and opportunities for prevention across the lifespan.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Type 2 diabetes prevention across the life course.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Discrete White Matter Lesions in Clusters and Harmony: Using Oblique Strategies to Study Brain Aging.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness in Relation to the Supporting Clinical Evidence Across the Type 2 Diabetes Continuum: A Review of Metformin and SGLT2is.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- [Biobanking in internal medicine : Structures, opportunities and cultural responsibility].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Beyond Glucose-Rethinking Prediabetes for Precision Prevention.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- A Context-Adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (Small Steps for Big Changes) in Australia: Protocol for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Should Prediabetes Be Classified as a Treatable Disease?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Anti-inflammatory diets for prediabetes remission: a mechanistic and practical roadmap.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- 3. Prevention or Delay of Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Approaches for sustaining diabetes prevention program practices post-graduation: A scoping review.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Review
- Metformin-Enhanced Digital Therapeutics for the Affordable Primary Prevention of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases: Advancing Low-Cost Solutions for Lifestyle-Related Chronic Disorders.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pathobiology of Prediabetes: Understanding and Interrupting Progressive Dysglycemia and Associated Complications.Diabetes · 2025Review
- Two decades of diabetes prevention: Sustained benefits, heterogeneous effects, and implications for precision prevention.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Article
- Association of the triglyceride-glucose index combined with a body shape index with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in individuals with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stage 0-3: findings from two prospective cohorts.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Observational
- Fasting glucose improvement following a short-term, culturally adapted lifestyle intervention in Latino adults at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a quasi-experimental study.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- The Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcomes Study: NIDDK's Journey Into the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Public Health Impact.Diabetes care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
backgroundIn the US Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), a 3-year randomised clinical trial in 3234 adults with prediabetes, type 2 diabetes incidence was reduced by 58% with intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) and by 31% with metformin, compared with placebo. We sought to assess the long-term effects and potential heterogeneity of treatment effects over approximately 21 years of follow-up.
methodsThe DPP trial was continued with protocol modifications as the DPP Outcomes Study (DPPOS). In the DPPOS, placebo was discontinued, metformin (850 mg twice a day as tolerated) was continued after unmasking, and group-based booster intervention classes were offered to the ILS group twice a year; additionally, all participants were offered group-based lifestyle intervention four times a year. The prespecified primary outcome during DPP and DPPOS was diabetes incidence defined by American Diabetes Association criteria. The DPPOS protocol specified continued diabetes incidence as an outcome; Feb 23, 2020, was chosen as the closing date for the present analysis, as a date prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused major disruptions in clinic visits and complicated longitudinal data analyses. We assessed long-term persistence of intervention effects on diabetes incidence, and heterogeneity of effects in subgroups defined by baseline diabetes risk factors. Follow-up is reported for the combined study from July 31, 1996, to Feb 23, 2020, and analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00004992 (DPP) and NCT00038727 (DPPOS); follow-up is ongoing but the trial is closed to enrolment except for previous DPP participants.
findings3195 participants originally enrolled in the DPP were included in the present analyses. This population comprised 2171 (67·9%) female participants and 1024 (32·1%) male participants, with a mean baseline age of 50·6 years (SD 10·7). Individual follow-up times ranged from 0·2 to 23·2 years (median 8·0 years [IQR 3·0 to 18·0]); remaining numbers at risk decreased sharply after 21 years because of administrative censoring and thus follow-up was considered to represent a 21-year period. During follow-up, compared with placebo, diabetes incidence rate was reduced in the original ILS group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [95% CI 0·68 to 0·85], rate difference [RD] -1·59 cases [95% CI -2·25 to -0·93] per 100 person-years) and in the original metformin group (HR 0·83 [0·74 to 0·93], RD -1·17 [-1·85 to -0·49]), with corresponding increases in median diabetes-free survival of 3·5 years and 2·5 years, and mean diabetes-free survival of 2·0 years (95% CI 1·2 to 2·8) and 1·2 years (0·4 to 2·0), respectively. The diabetes cumulative incidence curves separated early, especially in the first 3 years, with lower incidence rates in the metformin and ILS groups than in the placebo group. The metformin and ILS curves progressively converged with longer follow-up. The overall treatment effects appeared to result from large early effects during the DPP. Absolute intervention effects, measured as RDs versus placebo, were greater with ILS in participants with higher values for baseline fasting glucose, HbA
interpretationThe large initial intervention effects seen in the DPP trial were followed by sustained reductions in cumulative diabetes incidence for 21 years. Intervention effects were heterogeneous according to some baseline variables. These findings could guide precision interventions to help address the current type 2 diabetes epidemic.
fundingUS National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and other agencies. TRANSLATION: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.