Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40311303›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2025

Uncertainty mapping and probabilistic tractography using Simulation-based Inference in diffusion MRI: A comparison with classical Bayes.

J P Manzano-Patrón, Michael Deistler, Cornelius Schröder, Theodore Kypraios, Pedro J Gonçalves, Jakob H Macke, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-modal Monte Carlo MRI simulator of tissue microstructure.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J P Manzano-PatrónSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: Jose.ManzanoPatron2@nottingham.ac.uk.
Michael DeistlerMachine Learning in Science, Excellence Cluster Machine Learning, University of Tübingen & Tübingen AI Center, Germany.
Cornelius SchröderMachine Learning in Science, Excellence Cluster Machine Learning, University of Tübingen & Tübingen AI Center, Germany.
Theodore KypraiosSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK.
Pedro J GonçalvesVIB-Neuroelectronics Research Flanders (NERF), Belgium; Department of Computer Science and Department of Electrical Engineering, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Jakob H MackeMachine Learning in Science, Excellence Cluster Machine Learning, University of Tübingen & Tübingen AI Center, Germany; Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Stamatios N SotiropoulosSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: stamatios.sotiropoulos@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation-Based Inference (SBI) has recently emerged as a powerful framework for Bayesian inference: Neural networks are trained on simulations from a forward model, and learn to rapidly estimate posterior distributions. We here present an SBI framework for parametric spherical deconvolution of diffusion MRI data of the brain. We demonstrate its utility for estimating white matter fibre orientations, mapping uncertainty of voxel-based estimates and performing probabilistic tractography by spatially propagating fibre orientation uncertainty. We conduct an extensive comparison against established Bayesian methods based on Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) and find that: a) in-silico training can lead to calibrated SBI networks with accurate parameter estimates and uncertainty mapping for both single- and multi-shell diffusion MRI, b) SBI allows amortised inference of the posterior distribution of model parameters given unseen observations, which is orders of magnitude faster than MCMC, c) SBI-based tractography yields reconstructions that have a high level of agreement with their MCMC-based counterparts, equal to or higher than scan-rescan reproducibility of estimates. We further demonstrate how SBI design considerations (such as dealing with noise, defining priors and handling model selection) can affect performance, allowing us to identify optimal practices. Taken together, our results show that SBI provides a powerful alternative to classical Bayesian inference approaches for fast and accurate model estimation and uncertainty mapping in MRI.

Indexed as

BrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedWhite MatterAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsUncertaintyArtificial neural networksBall & SticksBayesian inferencedMRIFibre orientationsMarkov-Chain Monte-CarloParametric deconvolution

Identifiers

PMID40311303
PMCPMC7619459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.