ArticlePsychiatry research2025
Lower- versus higher-order suicide-related attentional processing measures as predictors of adolescent suicide ideation and attempt.
Article in Psychiatry research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pessimistic repetitive thought, goal-oriented repetitive thought, and positive indulging about the future as predictors of suicide ideation among treatment-seeking adolescents.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Parent-adolescent communication, self-esteem, and suicidal ideation in Chinese adolescents: evidence from a four-wave longitudinal study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Physiological and cognitive reactivity to social exclusion among emerging adults with versus without a suicide attempt history.Psychiatry research communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive theories suggest that biased suicide-related attentional processing confers risk for suicide ideation (SI) and attempts (SAs), but studies to date, which have been mixed, have not compared lower- and higher-order measures of attentional processes. The present study examined attention fixation, attention disengagement, and semantic interference as predictors of future SI and SA among adolescents, a high-risk age group for onset of SI and SAs. Adolescents (N = 135) (75 % female), ages 12-19 (M = 15.4, SD = 1.9), who presented to emergency or outpatient departments with SI (n = 84) or a SA (n = 51) completed an attention disengagement task (ADT), Suicide Stroop task, and the Attentional Fixation on Suicide Experiences Questionnaire (AFSEQ). A subsample of adolescents completed 3-month (n = 98) and 12-month follow-up assessments (n = 96) of SI severity and SA (n = 118) (based on adolescent or caregiver report). AFSEQ score predicted SI severity at 3- and 12-months, respectively, b = 0.47, p < .05; b = 0.44, p < .01, adjusting for ADT and relevant covariates, and also predicted SA at follow up, OR = 1.06, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.12, p < .05, adjusting for SA history, but not after adjusting for SI. Greater suicide-related attention disengagement difficulty predicted greater SI severity at 12 months, b = 0.03, p < .05, but not at 3 months. Self-reported, higher-order, attentional fixation may better predict future suicide-related risk among diverse adolescents than lower-order cognitive tasks assessing suicide-related attention disengagement or semantic interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.