Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40311115›Full record

Observational studyJMIR nursing2025

Detecting Older Adults' Behavior Changes During Adverse External Events Using Ambient Sensing: Longitudinal Observational Study.

Roschelle Fritz, Diane Cook

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roschelle Fritz *Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis Health, 4610 X St, Sacramento, CA, 95817, United States, 1 9167344349.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-6763
Diane Cook *School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4441-7508

Funding

A clinician-in-the-loop smart home to support health monitoring and intervention for chronic conditions: Supplement to focus on Alzheimer's and/or other dementiasR01NR016732 · NINR · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Diane Joyce Cook, Roschelle Fritz · 2017 to 2026
$3.5M
Smart Technologies for Health Assessment and AssistanceR01EB009675 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, DIANE JOYCE, SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, MAUREEN · 2010 to 2017
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009675NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older adults manage multiple impacts on health, including chronic conditions and adverse external events. Smart homes are positioned to have a positive impact on older adults' health by (1) allowing new understandings of behavior change so risks associated with external events can be assessed, (2) quantifying the impact of social determinants on health, and (3) designing interventions that respond appropriately to detected behavior changes. Information derived from smart home sensors can provide objective data about behavior changes to support a learning health care system. In this paper, we introduce a smart home capable of detecting behavior changes that occur during adverse external events like pandemics and wildfires. Objective: Examine digital markers collected before and during 2 events (the COVID-19 pandemic and wildfires) to determine whether clinically relevant behavior changes can be observed and targeted upstream interventions suggested. Methods: Secondary analysis of historic ambient sensor data collected on 39 adults managing one or more chronic conditions was performed. Interrupted time series analysis was used to extract behavior markers related to external events. Comparisons were made to examine differences between exposures using machine learning classifiers. Results: Behavior changes were detected for 2 adverse external events (the COVID-19 pandemic and wildfire smoke) initially and over time. However, the direction and magnitude of change differed between participants and events. Significant pandemic-related behavior changes ranked by impact included a decrease in time (3.8 hours/day) spent out of home, an increase in restless sleep (946.74%), and a decrease in indoor activity (38.89%). Although participants exhibited less restless sleep during exposure to wildfire smoke (120%), they also decreased their indoor activity (114.29%). Sleep duration trended downward during the pandemic shutdown. Time out of home and sleep duration gradually decreased while exposed to wildfire smoke. Behavior trends differed across exposures. In total, two key discoveries were made: (1) using retrospective analysis, the smart home was capable of detecting behavior changes related to 2 external events; and (2) older adults' sleep efficiency, time out of home, and overall activity levels changed while experiencing external events. These behavior markers can inform future sensor-based monitoring research and clinical application. Conclusions: Sensor-based findings could support individualized interventions aimed at sustaining the health of older adults during events like pandemics and wildfires. Creating care plans that directly respond to sensor-derived health information, like adding guided indoor exercise, web-based socialization sessions, and mental health-promoting activities, would have practical impacts on wellness. The smart home's novel, evidence-based information could inform future management of chronic conditions, allowing nurses to understand patients' health-related behaviors between the care points so timely, individualized interventions are possible.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health BehaviorWildfiresAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePandemicsair pollutionchronic diseaseCOVID-19digital phenotypinginternet of things

Identifiers

PMID40311115
PMCPMC12061350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.