ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2025
A State-of-the-Science Review of Long-Term Predictions of Climate Change Impacts on Dengue Transmission Risk.
Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global, Regional, and National Burden of Malaria and Dengue from 1992 to 2021, with Projections to 2036: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Climate change and zoonotic spillover: lessons from recent hantavirus events.BMC global and public health · 2026Article
- Association of Climatic Factors with Frequency of Dengue.Infectious disease reports · 2026Article
- DengueGNN: Graph-based deep learning for modeling disease spread dynamics and prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Refining the suitable conditions index to predict dengue fever transmission in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Assessing dengue knowledge, attitudes and preventive practices in France and Italy: A cross-sectional study using participatory surveillance cohorts.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate change is predicted to profoundly impact dengue transmission risk, yet a thorough review of evidence is necessary to refine understanding of climate scenarios, projection periods, spatial resolutions, and modeling approaches.
objectivesWe conducted a state-of-the-science review to comprehensively understand long-term dengue risk predictions under climate change, identify research gaps, and provide evidence-based guidelines for future studies.
methodsWe searched three medical databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) up to 5 December 2024 to extract relevant modeling studies. An a
resultsOf 5,035 studies retrieved, 57 met inclusion criteria. Prediction for dengue risk ranged from 1950 to 2115, and 52.63% ( DISCUSSION: We identified the urgent need to strengthen dengue databases, use finer spatial resolutions to integrate big data, and incorporate potential socioenvironmental factors such as human movement, vegetation, microclimate, and vector control efficacy in modeling. Utilizing appropriate spatiotemporal models and validation techniques will be crucial for developing functional climate-driven early warning systems for dengue fever. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14463.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.