ArticleJMIR medical education2025
Factors Influencing Educators' Perspectives on Accepting Extended Reality in Health Care Education: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ecological mechanism of digital technology integration: a comparative study of psychological and institutional support among university teachers in China and Kazakhstan.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPalestinian higher education institutions face limitations in providing interactive practical training for medical education. Extended reality (XR), which encompasses virtual reality and augmented reality, is increasingly recognized for addressing these challenges by offering immersive learning experiences.
objectiveThis study investigates the factors influencing the acceptance and adoption of XR in health care education within Palestinian universities, exploring its potential to transform traditional teaching methods.
methodsA qualitative approach was used in this study to collect data through semistructured interviews and artifacts from the participants. The participants of the study were 25 faculty members from 2 large Palestinian universities who teach in the field of medical sciences.
resultsThree primary categories-external, internal, and design-related factors-emerged as pivotal in influencing XR adoption. Professional development, technical support, and infrastructure were key external enablers. Internally, prior experience with digital tools and positive attitudes had a significant impact on the adoption of XR. Design factors, including ease of use and interactivity, played a crucial role but also posed challenges for less tech-savvy educators. Despite barriers such as cost and technical issues, XR demonstrated notable benefits, including enhanced learning outcomes, improved knowledge retention, and the ability to simulate complex medical scenarios.
conclusionsXR technologies offer transformative potential for health care education in Palestine. By addressing challenges and leveraging XR's strengths, educational institutions can foster innovation and improve student engagement and skill acquisition. The study contributes to the theoretical understanding of technology acceptance in education by identifying the interplay of external, internal, and design factors. Practically, it emphasizes strategic investments in infrastructure, professional training, and institutional policies to optimize XR integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.