Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40310597›Full record

SynthesisClinical child and family psychology review2025

The Impact of Modifiable Parenting Factors on the Screen Use of Children Five Years or Younger: A Systematic Review.

Blake Pyne, Olifa Asmara, Alina Morawska

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intergenerational Co-parenting and Children's Screen Use: A Scoping Review.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. YouTube Viewing and Content Quality in Toddlers.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Blake PyneParenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, 13 Upland Road, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.
Olifa AsmaraParenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, 13 Upland Road, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.
Alina MorawskaParenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, 13 Upland Road, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia. alina@psy.uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9404-5423

Funding

ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course CE200100025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most children under age 5 exceed recommended screen time guidelines, with lifelong implications for children's psychosocial, cognitive, socio-emotional, and physiological outcomes. Socio-ecological models point towards the important contribution of parental knowledge, modelling, practices, self-efficacy and style on child screen use. This study aimed to determine the extent to which these parenting factors influence child screen use, as well as the moderating role of screen media type (i.e. fixed vs. portable) on the relationship between parenting factors and child screen use. A systematic literature search for peer-reviewed studies published in English from 1982 to 2023 was conducted and yielded 87 eligible studies. Greater parental modelling, mealtime viewing, and the use of screens as a babysitting, mood regulation or reinforcement tool, were associated with higher child screen use. Contrastingly, higher levels of parental self-efficacy, and the implementation of screen use rules were associated with lower child screen use. Interventions targeting these parenting factors pose as a promising avenue to reduce child screen use. An authoritative parenting style was associated with lower child screen use, while authoritarian and permissive styles were associated with higher child screen use. The evidence for parental knowledge and co-viewing and, a neglectful parenting style was inconsistent or inconclusive. Finally, no observable trends or patterns in the data regarding the role of screen media type emerged. Future research should look to address issues in the measurement of child screen use to ensure comprehensive and objective assessments.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorParent-Child RelationsParentingScreen TimeSelf EfficacyChild, PreschoolHumansInfantParentingPortable mediaPre-schoolersScreen useSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40310597
PMCPMC12162779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.