ArticleSports medicine - open2025
Predicting Anabolic Androgenic Steroid Doping among Specialized Health Care Patients with Elastic Net Regression Reveals Potential Laboratory Variables for "Patient Biological Passport".
Article in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent years have brought significant development in athlete doping use detection with the implementation of the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP). The aim of this study was to explore if similar methods could also be used to detect non-medical use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) among clinical patients. For this purpose, six elastic net regression models were trained in a sample of Finnish specialized health care male patients (N = 2918; no doping = 1911, AAS doping = 1007), using different approaches to longitudinal laboratory measurements as predictive variables. The laboratory data was retrieved from the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS) data lake, and doping use status was defined by patient disclosure, recorded in digital medical record free texts. Length of observation time (e.g., time between the first and last laboratory measurement) was used as weight. Model performance was tested with holdout cross-validation.
resultsAll the tested models showed promising discriminative ability. The best fit was achieved by using the existence of out-of-reference range measurements of 31 laboratory parameters as predictors of AAS doping, with test data area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.757 (95% CI 0.725-0.789).
conclusionsThe findings of this preliminary study suggest that AAS doping could be detected in clinical context using real-life longitudinal laboratory data. Further model development is encouraged, with added dimensions regarding the use of different AAS substances, length of doping use, and other background data that may further increase the diagnostic accuracy of these models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.