Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40310571›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2025

Assessment of metal artifacts from titanium wrist prostheses: photon-counting versus energy-integrating detector CT.

Nina Kämmerling, Simon Farnebo, Mårten Sandstedt, Ronald Booij, Anders Persson, Erik Tesselaar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nina KämmerlingDepartment of Radiology, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. nina.kammerling@regionostergotland.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3986-9737
Simon FarneboDepartment of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Mårten SandstedtDepartment of Radiology, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ronald BooijCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anders PerssonDepartment of Radiology, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Erik TesselaarCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Region Östergötland RÖ-965126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe compared photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) polyenergetic images, PCD-CT virtual monoenergetic images (VMI), and energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT) polyenergetic images regarding bone visualization and metal artifacts in patients with titanium wrist prostheses.

methodsAfter ethical approval, 15 patients were examined with PCD-CT and EID-CT. Polyenergetic images were reconstructed, as well as 130-keV VMI for PCD-CT. Five radiologists evaluated bone visualization, interpretability at metal-bone interface and metal artifacts using a 7-point ordinal scale. Streak artifacts and artifacts at the bone-metal interface were quantitatively assessed. Differences between image setups were analyzed using Friedman test and one-way ANOVA with post hoc tests.

resultsBone visualization was superior in PCD-CT polyenergetic images (median rating 6, range 3-7) compared with VMI (5, 3-7; p < 0.001) and EID-CT (5, 3-7; p = 0.018). Streak artifacts were more pronounced with PCD-CT polyenergetic images (4, 3-6) compared with EID-CT (5, 4-6; p = 0.003) and PCD-CT VMI (5, 3-7; p = 0.002), with quantitative results showing least streak artifacts in PCD-CT VMI, followed by EID-CT and PCD-CT polyenergetic images (50 ± 7%, 70 ± 6%, and 79 ± 5%, respectively; p < 0.001). Interpretability at bone-metal interface was better with PCD-CT polyenergetic images (5, 2-7; p = 0.045) and EID-CT (5, 3-6; p = 0.018) compared with PCD-CT VMI (4, 2-6), without quantitative differences.

conclusionStreak artifacts from titanium wrist prostheses were reduced using 130-keV PCD-CT VMI, while bone visualization was highest using PCD-CT polyenergetic images. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In patients with wrist implants, photon-counting detector CT allows for effective metal artifact reduction using virtual monoenergetic images and improved bone visualization using polyenergetic images. As polyenergetic images and VMI have different advantages, access to both image setups may benefit diagnostic evaluation. KEY POINTS: Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) presented a substantial reduction of metal streak artifacts. Polyenergetic images exhibited better image quality for bone imaging compared with VMI. A combination of image reconstructions should be preferred depending on the diagnostic task.

Indexed as

ArtifactsJoint ProsthesisMetalsProstheses and ImplantsTitaniumTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotonsMetalsTitaniumArthroplastyArtifactsTitaniumTomography (x-ray computed)Wrist joint

Identifiers

PMID40310571
PMCPMC12045920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.