ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2025
Pharmacological approaches and physical restraint in dental care for individuals with intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities and challenging behaviour: a scoping review of patients' and caregivers' experiences.
Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is controversy and debate around the use of pharmacological and physical dental behaviour support techniques amongst practitioners treating patients with challenging behaviour and intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities. However, the experiences of patients and caregivers remain underexplored. This scoping review aimed to identify the experience of patients with intellectual and neurodevelopemental disabilities and challenging behaviour and their caregivers regarding the use of physical and pharmacological procedures during dental care.
methodsA scoping review was conducted, incorporating evidence from both quantitative and qualitative study designs to clarify concepts and identify gaps in the literature, using all the main medical databases.
resultsFrom 1575 screened records, 13 studies were included. Ten were quantitative or mixed-method studies focusing on the acceptance of behaviour support techniques from the caregiver's perspective, particularly for children with special needs. Seven studies were from the Americas, none from Europe or Africa. Two major themes emerged: validity of consent; and the acceptance of different dental behaviour support techniques by parents and caregivers.
conclusionThe most acceptable techniques for parents and caregivers were non-invasive, behaviour based support techniques. When these failed, physical support techniques seemed to be more acceptable than pharmacological approaches (sedation or general anaesthesia), although this may be related to cultural context and/or lack of financial support. No studies reported the patient perspective of behaviour support techniques so no conclusions can be drawn as to which techniques are acceptable from the patient's point of view. Further qualitative studies are essential to explore the experiences and expectations of patients with special dental care needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40310567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.