Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40310545›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2025

Effects of Preoperative Cervical Range of Motion on Clinical Outcomes Following Posterior Decompression: A Multicenter Study of Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Toshiki Okubo, Narihito Nagoshi, Hitoshi Kono, Kenya Nojiri, Kentaro Fukuda, Takeshi Ikegami, Takashi Tsuji, Yosuke Horiuchi, Takahito Iga, Kazuki Takeda and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Toshiki OkuboDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0912-7422
Narihito NagoshiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8267-5789
Hitoshi KonoKeio Spine Research Group (KSRG), Tokyo, Japan.
Kenya NojiriKeio Spine Research Group (KSRG), Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro FukudaKeio Spine Research Group (KSRG), Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi IkegamiKeio Spine Research Group (KSRG), Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi TsujiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke HoriuchiKeio Spine Research Group (KSRG), Tokyo, Japan.
Takahito IgaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuki TakedaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3857-4985
Masahiro OzakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi SuzukiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Morio MatsumotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaya NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kota WatanabeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4830-4690
Ken IshiiKeio Spine Research Group (KSRG), Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0094-7918
Junichi YamaneKeio Spine Research Group (KSRG), Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective multicenter study.ObjectivesTo investigate the impact of preoperative cervical range of motion (ROM) on clinical outcomes after posterior decompression for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).MethodsWe analyzed data from 156 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent posterior decompression and were followed for at least 2 years. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative gap ROM, which was a novel indicator representing the difference between flexion and extension ROM: the gROM <0° and >0° groups, and their outcomes were compared.ResultsThere were no significant differences in patient demographics or surgical details between the gROM <0° and >0° groups. The gROM <0° group exhibited less lordosis in C2-7 angles before and after surgery compared to the gROM >0° group. Cervical ROM significantly decreased following posterior decompression regardless of whether preoperative gROM was <0° or >0°. Meanwhile, the incidence of perioperative complications was similar between the two groups. Furthermore, both groups showed significant improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores postoperatively; however, there were no significant group differences in JOA scores, recovery rates, or visual analog scale for neck pain between the two groups at the preoperation and final follow-up.ConclusionsThe incidence of perioperative complications and postoperative clinical outcomes were comparable regardless of the magnitude of preoperative cervical gROM. Although cervical ROM decrease postoperatively, posterior decompression for cervical OPLL can offer favorable clinical outcomes irrespective of the preoperative cervical ROM magnitude, consequently.

Indexed as

laminectomylaminoplastymulticenter studyossification of the posterior longitudinal ligamentrange of motiontreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID40310545
PMCPMC11559856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.