ArticleGlobal spine journal2025
Effects of Preoperative Cervical Range of Motion on Clinical Outcomes Following Posterior Decompression: A Multicenter Study of Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
Article in Global spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association and predictive value of systemic immune-inflammation index and body mass index in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective multicenter study.ObjectivesTo investigate the impact of preoperative cervical range of motion (ROM) on clinical outcomes after posterior decompression for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).MethodsWe analyzed data from 156 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent posterior decompression and were followed for at least 2 years. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative gap ROM, which was a novel indicator representing the difference between flexion and extension ROM: the gROM <0° and >0° groups, and their outcomes were compared.ResultsThere were no significant differences in patient demographics or surgical details between the gROM <0° and >0° groups. The gROM <0° group exhibited less lordosis in C2-7 angles before and after surgery compared to the gROM >0° group. Cervical ROM significantly decreased following posterior decompression regardless of whether preoperative gROM was <0° or >0°. Meanwhile, the incidence of perioperative complications was similar between the two groups. Furthermore, both groups showed significant improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores postoperatively; however, there were no significant group differences in JOA scores, recovery rates, or visual analog scale for neck pain between the two groups at the preoperation and final follow-up.ConclusionsThe incidence of perioperative complications and postoperative clinical outcomes were comparable regardless of the magnitude of preoperative cervical gROM. Although cervical ROM decrease postoperatively, posterior decompression for cervical OPLL can offer favorable clinical outcomes irrespective of the preoperative cervical ROM magnitude, consequently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.