ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Germany in pharmacology publishing: 192 articles with 1367 citations in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives vs. 16,775 articles with 274,225 citations elsewhere.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bibliometric study of the most-cited research articles and reviews in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology (1969-2024).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Country-specific citation disparities in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology from 2001 to 2024.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Germany has played a central role in the development of Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology (NSAP), historically leading its publication output for nearly 150 years. However, recent bibliometric analysis of 25,935 articles revealed a dramatic decline in German contributions, with the country falling to fifth place between 2021 and 2025. To understand this shift, we conducted a comprehensive bibliometric study of 28,149 pharmacology- and toxicology-related publications from German institutions indexed in Scopus between 2019 and 2024. Our findings indicate a strong trend toward publishing in high-impact journals: 61% of the publications appeared in Q1 journals and 28% in Q2. Although NSAP ranked 28th in publication volume, the vast majority of German research-over 16,700 articles-was disseminated through other venues, many with significantly higher citation metrics. These shifts highlight the growing influence of bibliometric indicators on publication behavior. While such trends reflect global academic pressures, they also prompt a critical reflection on the value of legacy journals. We advocate for renewed institutional support and national awareness to maintain NSAP as a respected platform for pharmacological research, balancing impact metrics with scientific heritage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40310531What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.