Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40310522›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Systematic review of the association between sleep apnea and postoperative complications after ENT surgery.

Ulrik Ørsø Andersen, Casper Grønlund, Sarah Line Lindskov Thomsen, Bahareh Bakhshaie Philipsen, Asbjørn Kørvel-Hanquist, Preben Homøe, Thora Grothe Thomsen, Anja Geisler

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ulrik Ørsø AndersenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1 4600, Køge, Denmark. ulle08@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4662-7307
Casper GrønlundDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1 4600, Køge, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2636-4091
Sarah Line Lindskov ThomsenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1 4600, Køge, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2787-4938
Bahareh Bakhshaie PhilipsenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1 4600, Køge, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4889-458X
Asbjørn Kørvel-HanquistDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1 4600, Køge, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6645-1926
Preben HomøeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1 4600, Køge, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2877-3518
Thora Grothe ThomsenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1 4600, Køge, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1767-3204
Anja GeislerDepartment of Transplantation and Organ Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-2672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review aims to determine whether patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) surgery have an increased risk of postoperative complications.

methodsThe review followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. The search was performed and updated the on 27th of August 2024 and included all studies involving adults diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing ENT surgery. Studies focused on OSA-specific surgeries were excluded. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias for the included studies. The primary outcome was all reported postoperative complications.

resultsThe search identified 18,487 articles, with 88 full-text articles reviewed. Three studies, encompassing 1,071 patients, were finally included. The complications reported were desaturation, postoperative hypertension, and infections. All three studies had a serious risk of bias.

conclusionThis review finds an increased risk of specific complications, including desaturation, hypertension, and infection, in OSA patients undergoing ENT surgery. However, the current body of evidence is significantly limited by the small sample sizes, heterogeneity in study design, variability in diagnostic methods, and inconsistent outcome reporting across the included studies. These limitations hinder the ability to draw definitive conclusions or establish clear recommendations regarding the perioperative management of OSA patients in ENT settings, including whether routine postoperative admission is warranted. The findings emphasize the urgent need for more rigorous, high-quality research to guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveHumansRisk FactorsENT surgeryInfectionObstructive sleep apneaPostoperative complicationsSleep apneaSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.