ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Comparison of coiling followed by staged-flow diversion and flow diversion-assisted coiling for intracranial very large and giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and Technical Feasibility of Staged Flow Diverter Placement Following Coil Embolization: A Case Series Including Anatomically Challenging Aneurysms.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the clinical and imaging efficacy of flow diversion-assisted coiling (FD-assisted coiling) and coiling followed by staged-flow diversion (staged-FD) in the treatment of very large and giant intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. Between April 2015 and June 2024, 60 patients with very large and giant (≥ 20 mm in diameter) saccular intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery were retrospectively analyzed at a single institution. Patients were classified into two groups: the FD-assisted coiling group (n = 45) and the staged-FD group (n = 15). Immediate occlusion rates, perioperative complication rates, and clinical and imaging follow-up results were compared between the two groups. Aneurysm occlusion was determined using the O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading system. The rate of complete or subtotal immediate postoperative occlusion was significantly higher in the staged-FD group compared to the FD-assisted coiling group [60% (9/15) vs. 26.7% (12/45), p = 0.019]. The complication rate was significantly lower in the staged-FD group compared to the FD-assisted coiling group[0% (0/15) vs. 31.1% (14/45), p = 0.034]. On postoperative day 190 (172.3, 204.3), 45 patients in both groups underwent mid-term DSA. In the FD-assisted coiling group, 54.8% (17/31) had OKM D. In the staged-FD group, 63.6% (7/11) had OKM D. The median time interval between the first-stage coiled embolization and the second-stage FD placement was 40 (15,69) days. For very large and giant saccular intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery, coiling followed by staged-FD achieves higher rates of complete or subtotal embolization in the immediate postoperative period and has a lower complication rate compared to single-stage FD-assisted coiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40310518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.