ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Twenty-Four Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Offspring Conceived Through Assisted Reproductive Technologies.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne in fifty infants is conceived through assisted reproductive technologies (ART). To date, data on the cardiovascular morbidity of ART individuals is ambiguous. This study investigated the vascular function of young ART subjects using 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24 h ABPM).
methodsART subjects and spontaneously conceived controls matched in age as well as sex were enrolled. A 24 h blood pressure profile including pulse wave analysis was executed in all study participants. Blood pressure readings were assessed every 15 min during daytime and every 30 min during nighttime. The 24 h systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) as well as central blood pressure, nocturnal blood pressure decrease, and 24 h pulse wave velocity (PWV) were analyzed.
resultsA total of 41 ART individuals and 46 spontaneously conceived peers were included in the final analysis (mean age: 15.37 ± 5.46 years vs. 16.48 ± 5.23 years,
conclusionsIn contrast to previous studies, no significant differences in 24 h blood pressure were demonstrated between ART subjects and spontaneously conceived peers. Hence, the results of this study do not indicate an unfavorable blood pressure profile in ART offspring. Larger multi-centric studies are needed to validate these results in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.