ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Case Series and Review of Febrile-Infection Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES).
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anakinra for tocilizumab-refractory febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome with normal IL-1β levels: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Blockade of Interleukin-6 Receptor with Tocilizumab During the Acute Phase of Childhood Immune-Mediated Epilepsy can Lead to a Favorable Outcome - an Observational Study.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFIRES is a rare and catastrophic presentation of a de novo refractory status epilepticus (RSE) in healthy individuals following mild febrile illness. It carries a high burden of morbidity and an estimated mortality of 12% in children. In over half of patients, an underlying cause is not discovered (cryptogenic FIRES). The theory that post-infectious inflammation promotes aberrant neuronal excitation has led to the use of immunomodulatory therapies as treatment for FIRES. High-dose glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are used as first-line therapies but are ineffective in most cases. A comprehensive initial evaluation is critical in directing second-line therapies; however, an autoimmune and inflammatory workup is seldom completed prior to treatment. Despite recent trends toward using cytokine-directed therapies, outcomes remain poor.
methodsThis single-institution retrospective case series describes three cases of FIRES in similarly aged children. Each patient experienced super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) resistant to first-line systemic immunotherapy (SIT). The novel use of baricitinib, a non-selective JAK inhibitor, proved effective for one patient, while IL-1 and IL-6 inhibition were effective in the other two. All patients suffered moderate-to-severe neurologic and cognitive impairment at the time of discharge.
conclusionsFIRES is a poorly understood catastrophic presentation of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) requiring a multimodal approach to treatment. Cytokine profiling can be helpful in identifying cryptogenic cases from those with an underlying cause if conducted early in the clinical course. The early use of second-line immunomodulatory therapies may aid in decreasing neuroinflammation and improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.