ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancing Pediatric Surgery with Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Imaging: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Hematologic Malignancies.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Optimization of Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Mapping with Indocyanine Green for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Advances in Fluorescent Adjuncts in Pediatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Applications of Indocyanine Green Across Surgical Specialties.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Navigation in Pediatric Hepatobiliary Surgery: Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has revolutionized pediatric surgery by enhancing precision, safety, and outcomes across various specialties. In recent years, its use has spread through the framework of pediatric surgery, where its ability to illuminate anatomical structures and pathological conditions has improved surgical outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was performed using the term "Indocyanine green" in all fields, including papers about pediatric patients (aged 0-18 years) published between January 2014 and July 2024.
resultsThis review systematically explores ICG applications, dosing regimens, timing of administration, and integration into modern surgical technologies, including robotics and minimally invasive platforms. ICG resulted in an excellent safety profile and enables the real-time visualization of anatomical structures and pathological conditions, proving invaluable in pediatric cases characterized by smaller anatomical dimensions and congenital anomalies.
conclusionsThis review highlights ICG fluorescence imaging as an indispensable tool in pediatric surgery, offering transformative potential for improving surgical outcomes and patient safety. Despite its advantages, it is necessary to standardize dosing and timing protocols to maximize its utility. The aim of this review is to explore the various applications of ICG in pediatric surgery, report the dosage and administration times across different surgical fields, and establish best practices to guide its future use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.