ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A National Trauma-Informed Adverse Childhood Experience Screening and Intervention Evaluation Project.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) measurement tools among children and adolescents in the Arab world: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of an Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening Program for Pregnant Patients in Rural Missouri.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAdverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic childhood events that can disrupt neurologic, endocrine, and immune regulation and increase the risk for poor health outcomes. This Trauma-Informed ACE Screening and Intervention Evaluation (TASIE) Quality Improvement (QI) Project, ECHO, evaluated (1) pediatric provider knowledge of ACEs, toxic stress, and trauma-informed care principles, (2) implementation of ACE screening and clinical response in practice, and (3) patient and provider perspectives around benefits and challenges of ACE screening.
methodsFrom November 2021 to May 2024, three cohorts, totaling 46 pediatric practices across the U.S., participated in the TASIE Project, which included 2 h ACE training, eight monthly 75 min ECHO sessions, and monthly QI coaching. A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate monthly data, while patient and provider surveys and provider focus groups were used to evaluate the program.
resultsAll 46 participating practices implemented ACE screening by the project's conclusion. Of the patients eligible for ACE screening, over half were screened for ACEs during the program. Providers increased comfort with discussing ACEs and screening questions. During the first month, the practices were reported to have provided education to 56% of patients, and by the end of the project, this rate increased to 79% of patients. Overall, 97% of caregivers and 92% of adolescents screened agreed or somewhat agreed that it is important for providers to know about ACEs and toxic stress so they can offer better care. By the end of the project, for each cohort, providers reported that they were able to screen effectively and efficiently in routine practice and were more familiar with local resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.